IBJNews

Six BrightPoint execs to share $31M golden parachute

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Six top executives at Indianapolis-based BrightPoint Inc. are expected to share a $30.7 million payout as part of the company’s planned merger with Ingram Micro Inc.

CEO and Chairman Robert Laikin stands to receive $14.1 million after his company is acquired by the Santa Ana, Calif.-based technology company, according to Securities & Exchange Commission documents released this week.

The roughly $840 million deal, announced July 2, is expected to close by the end of the year.

Plans call for Laikin to receive $6.5 million as a result of accelerated vesting of restricted shares in the 4,000-employee wireless device distributer and logistics company.

Additionally, Laikin would receive $3.5 million from an early liquidation of an executive pension plan.

The agreement also calls for a $4.1 million single payment to the BrightPoint CEO when the deal closes.

Laikin intends to stay on with the company after the merger as a senior adviser to Ingram CEO Alain Monie. The part-time job will net Laikin $900,000 a year and a one-time $2.2 million stock grant.

In addition to Laikin, five other BrightPoint executives are in line for big payouts.

J. Mark Howell, president of the company's Americas region, will get about $6.7 million. Anurag Gupta, president of the Europe, Middle East and Africa regions, will get $3.9 million. Chief Financial Officer Vincent Donargo awaits a $2.1 million payout and Asia Pacific President Bruce Tomlinson will receive $3.4 million.

Howell, Gupta, Tomlinson and Donargo are expected to remain with the merged company in senior roles.

Former CFO Anthony Boor, the sixth executive receiving a golden parachute, left BrightPoint in May 2011. He will receive $566,024 from the executive pension plan.

Company spokesman Tom Ward declined to comment Wednesday on the executives’ compensation, saying previous filings explained the compensation.

“I think all the information [in the filing] speaks for itself,” he said.

BrightPoint was founded in 1989 in Plainfield and has about 1,300 employees in central Indiana.

Shareholders will vote on the merger during a 9 a.m. meeting Sept. 19 at BrightPoint’s corporate headquarters in Indianapolis.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Brightpoint Screws its stockholder again
    Bob Laikin and his top six management cohorts have paid themselves millions of dollars out of this compnay's cash for many years. The bonuses and the severance package they are paying themselves is nothing compared to the rest of the money they will make from selling their own stock to Ingram Micro. Laikin managed this company for his own personal benefit and never for the stockholders! Let's see the IBJ report the facts of how much Laikin and his buddies are going to rake in from the sale of their shares to Ingram Micro.
  • Hmmm!
    So, 1300 people have jobs and investors made $. What's not to like? Good for them. It shouldn't be THEIR money?
    • Brightpoint
      Roger...remember that these guys gave themselves a 20% pay raise this year and have been taking the cash out for years. This $14mil is just an insult. They been paid this amount many times over and they are not majority holders. So....I on't think much of them and I know some things about the inside that you may not.
    • Really?!?!?
      "The part-time job will net Laikin $900,000 a year and a one-time $2.2 million stock grant." Yup. THAT sounds reasonable.
    • Doesn't seem like very much
      I might be jaded, but a $14mil payout seems like a pretty small nut for a multi-billion dollar Fortune 5 company that you started from scratch. Yikes.
      • Brightpoint
        That soucks. Management rode that company into the ground and now being rewarded with obscene packages....Gordon Gecko was right....screw the stockholders.
      • Bobby Laikin info
        Thought you might find this interesting. Big dollars to be sure.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

      2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

      3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

      4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

      5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

      ADVERTISEMENT