IBJNews

Slinky maker’s owner buys bankrupt Fundex for $1.7M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The owner of the company that makes the iconic Slinky has agreed to purchase bankrupt Fundex Games Ltd. at a price more than double its original bid of $800,000.

Propel Equity Partners, the parent of Plymouth, Mich.-based Poof-Slinky Inc., will pay $1.7 million for Plainfield-based Fundex in addition to 1 percent of its sales for the next 24 months, according to the settlement announced at a Thursday morning court hearing.

Interest in Fundex escalated during a court-ordered auction Wednesday in which a surprise bidder, Philadelphia-based discount chain Five Below, surfaced, driving up the price of Fundex to the delight of some creditors. Fundex has about $9 million in secured and unsecured debts.

“To suggest that it was a spirited bidding contest would be a vast understatement,” said K.C. Cohen, Fundex’s attorney. “We’re obviously grateful for Five Below showing up, but I still can’t figure out what they were doing there.”

The price Poof-Slinky paid for Fundex more than doubled the original $800,000 bid Greenwich, Conn-based Propel made earlier this month following Fundex’s attempt in September to reorganize its assets under the protection of bankruptcy.

Fundex’s bankruptcy represents a steep fall for the company that once had 50 employees and offices in Hong Kong and New York, and was the sole distributor of the industry’s second-most-popular card game, Phase 10.

Fundex’s other popular games include Gnip Gnop and What’s in Ned’s Head? What’s in Ned’s Head, which lets children remove fake items like moldy cheese, vomit and a rat from a stuffed head’s orifices, won a slew of awards and helped make Fundex a growing player in the game industry.

Just two years ago, Fundex boasted annual revenue of $25.8 million, according to court documents. Revenue, however, fell by nearly half, to $13.3 million, in 2011. At the time of the bankruptcy filing, the company had recorded a paltry $2.6 million in sales in 2012.

Fundex listed assets of nearly $1.5 million and liabilities of $8.9 million.

Some of the drop in sales likely can be attributed to its loss of Phase 10, whose owner was still trying to collect on royalties as part of a settlement agreement it signed with Fundex in October 2010.

The battle over the game began in December 2008 when Michigan inventor Kenneth Johnson accused Fundex of copyright infringement, trademark dilution, fraud, conversion and theft in a case filed in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis.

Phase 10, now distributed by Mattel, was a cash cow for Fundex, selling more than 3 million copies per year, second only to Uno.

The rummy-like game was the company’s first product when company President Chip Voigt and his father, game industry veteran Pete Voigt, launched Fundex in 1986.

The sale of Fundex is “a little bittersweet,” Chip Voigt said following the court hearing.

“It’s the end of a tough journey,” said Voigt, adding that he’s in discussions with the buyer on a potential future with Poof-Slinky.

Poof-Slinky already is quite familiar with Fundex. On Sept. 7, the same day it filed for bankruptcy protection, Fundex signed a contract to switch product distribution from San Francisco-based University Games Corp. to Poof-Slinky.

Poof-Slinky’s CEO, Ray Dallavecchia, has known Chip Voigt for years, said Robert Farinholt, a partner of Propel Equity Partners.

“Fundex is very complementary to our existing business,” Farinholt said. “We’re essentially thrilled to add [the games] to our existing product portfolio.”

In addition to making the Slinky, Poof-Slinky is a leading manufacturer of foam sports balls. Its brands include Cadaco, Educational Design Toys and Ideal, which makes a variety of table-top and board games.

Poof-Slinky says its products are sold in more than 35,000 retail outlets. The company operates manufacturing plants in Michigan and Pennsylvania, and has more than 125 employees.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

  2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

  3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

  4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

  5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).

ADVERTISEMENT