Sound Mind launches its third mutual fund

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Columbus, Ind.-based firm has launched a new mutual fund with hopes of catering to conservative investors.

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday approved the Sound Mind Balanced Fund, the third component in the Sound Mind Investing Fund family.

It includes 60 percent equity investments using the same strategy that’s a hallmark of the firm. But it also will include 40 percent bonds to provide balance for more risk-averse investors.

Sound Mind is among just a handful of mutual fund families based or managed in the state.

Its equity-investment strategy differs from its counterparts. Instead of betting on stocks, Sound Mind invests in other mutual funds that are performing well, based on relatively short-term metrics. It sticks with them until their performance slips out of the top quartile, based on returns over three-,six- and nine-month periods.

The approach was initially developed as the driving philosophy in a Christian financial newsletter, a separate entity called the Sound Mind Investing newsletter.

It has paid off this year. As of Tuesday, Sound Mind's flagship fund, comprised entirely of equity investments, was up 18 percent year-to-date. But it can force short-term pain, as fund managers must follow the prescribed formula, rather than dropping funds as soon as they begin performing poorly.

The new fund will incorporate the same strategy—termed “upgrading”—into its equity component. Sound Mind has brought on another Columbus firm, Reams Asset Management Co., to serve as advisers on the bond portion of the fund.

Fred Beerwart, Sound Mind’s chief compliance officer, said the new fund meets a need for the fund’s current investors, many of whom read the newsletter and are advised to diversify their portfolios.

“The 60-40 balanced approach does fit hand in glove with what our client base has been taught,” he said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now