IBJNews

Star's labyrinth of aging buildings complicates sale, reuse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

rop-star-jump-080612-15col.jpg The Indianapolis Star’s operations take up almost an entire city block, with the exception of the American Building (above left), which the newspaper sold earlier this year. (IBJ photo/Perry Reichanadter)

Let’s start with the good news: The acreage and location of the Indianapolis Star headquarters and its 500-space parking garage give a nice boost to its sale prospects.

The newspaper’s actual, 190,000-square-foot headquarters building? That’s a different story.

Local real estate developers and brokers say finding a reuse will be tricky for the Star’s labyrinth of buildings combined over the years with multiple floor levels, narrow hallways and a basement built to house printing presses. The newspaper, which has called the brick-faced offices at 307 N. Pennsylvania St. home since 1907, said late last month it was putting the property up for sale.

Listing agents in the local office of CBRE plan to run an RFP process, seeking buyers interested in developing the four-acre property as apartments, office space, a corporate headquarters or some as-yet-undetermined reuse.

Their charge is to unload the property for its highest and best use (read highest price) and find the Star’s 350-employee staff a smaller, leased space downtown more suited for a media property that has shed hundreds of employees as it adapts to the digital age. There’s no asking price.

“When we moved the press out of here in 2002, this building became way bigger than we’d ever need. To maintain it or retrofit it for a modern media company would be very expensive,” Star Publisher Karen Crotchfelt said in an interview. “We believe there’s a better place for us and hopefully a better owner for four acres of prime downtown real estate.”

Star locator mapThe Star headquarters site is compelling for a single-tenant office building or mid- to high-rise residential, but the existing building would have to come down to make it happen, said Brian F. Knapp, a veteran property investor and developer who serves as director of special assets and investment services for the local office of Seattle-based Colliers International.

“Trying to redevelop the guts of that building into something that works for a modern use—whether office, residential or retail, God forbid—it’s cost-prohibitive,” said Knapp, who did a walk-through of the building about 10 years ago. “I would bet dollars to doughnuts that it’s far more economically feasible to tear that building down. Something has to go up that can take advantage of the parking garage.”

From an office perspective, that’s a pre-leased and primarily single-tenant building, he said. The site sits just across University Park from the 28-story, 300 N. Meridian office tower and just north of the 36-story Regions Bank Tower. High-density, maybe even high-rise, apartments also could work at the right price points.

The downside to demolition: It’s so expensive that it could demolish the sale price pocketed by the newspaper’s parent company, Virginia-based Gannett Inc. Local developers say taking down the building likely would cost $7 to $10 per square foot, for a total of more than $1.5 million.

The newspaper is looking for a straightforward sale and not likely interested in partnering on a redevelopment, said Jeff Luebker, a managing director for global corporate services in the local office of Los Angeles-based CBRE.

“Owning real estate is not their core business,” he noted.

For tax purposes, the property is assessed at $21.3 million, well above what it’s likely to fetch from a sale. The assessment itself is telling as to where its value lies: The Assessor’s Office assigns a more than $14 million value to the land alone and just $7 million to the improvements.

Not everyone agrees demolition is the best option.

The Star could realize value from the property through an adaptive commercial reuse of the building, said Mike Higbee, president of locally based Development Concepts Inc. and a former director of the city’s Department of Metropolitan Development.

He doesn’t think the existing structure works for housing, and there’s “limited market appeal” even for most office or other commercial users, he said. The building’s configuration, including space that once housed the printing presses, presents big challenges.

Working in favor of a sale: the prime location within shouting distance of both Monument Circle and Mass Ave, and a strengthening downtown real estate market.

“It’s going to be a very interesting discussion for the city, No. 1, and No. 2, anyone who takes a look at that site,” Higbee said. “I don’t think there’s an obvious answer.”

The Mayor’s Office would consider incentives for a redevelopment of the site if it grows the tax base and amounts to a “sound business investment” for taxpayers, said Deron Kintner, who heads the Indianapolis Bond Bank and is set to take over for Michael Huber as deputy mayor for economic development.

Kintner acknowledged the current tax base for the property—records show Gannett is paying about $662,000 per year—could be an impediment to an incentive deal. To justify incentives, the project would have to generate more tax revenue than the property currently generates.

As for what uses make sense for the Star property, Kintner said, “The market will tell us.”

Higbee figures the cost of demolition limits the likelihood a developer could justify the numbers on a ground-up redevelopment.

One real upside is the seven-story parking garage: “It’s almost like a built-in incentive,” Higbee said. “That opens up some doors.”

In fact, CBRE plans to emphasize the garage as it recruits potential buyers.

One option that won’t be overlooked is a potential reuse of the property or at least parts of it as residential, said Jim Thomas, partner at locally based Hearthview Residential, which developed the nearby Athletic Club condominiums.

It comes down to space layout and organization, but Thomas figures a total gut and remodel of the connected six- and four-story buildings could yield 100 or more apartment units.

To justify demolition, he said, a new development would need to add improvements worth about six times as much as the value of the existing building.

“It’s hard to make any generalizations about these historic special-purpose buildings,” said Thomas, who hasn’t toured the building. “So many factors go into demolition versus reuse, particularly on idiosyncratic buildings.”

Luebker said there are “endless” scenarios for a reuse of the property—including multifamily, office and retail.

“Our strategy is really to allow the market to determine the highest and best use,” he said. “I think there are some very creative people in the marketplace. If a developer chooses to redevelop the existing improvements, they could probably come up with some very creative uses.”

CBRE does not have a timetable in mind for closing on a sale or finding new space for the Star newsroom, though it plans to work on both on a parallel track.

About 650 Gannett employees work in the building at 307 N. Pennsylvania St., 350 of them for the Star specifically, Crotchfelt said. If the building sells, the Star employees would move to leased space somewhere downtown.

The company has not settled on a location or size for its new space.

“Ideally, we’d love a combination of great functional space that inspires our employees mixed with a strong community presence that invites the community in,” she said.

Many Star employees were surprised by the announcement Gannett planned to sell the building, in part because the company has been renovating the newsroom. Reporters and editors are scheduled to move into the upgraded space this month.

Crotchfelt said she made the decision on the “less-than-six-figure” newsroom renovation in October and added that decisions about the sale of company real estate occur “at a much different level in our organization.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT