IBJNews

State cites Veolia Water over safety concerns

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Veolia Water Indianapolis is challenging a proposed $13,500 penalty sought by the state for three “serious” safety violations involving an excavation last February at the University of Indianapolis campus.

The Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited the operator of the city’s water system after an excavator hit a gas line at a depth of about 6 feet at Hanna Avenue and Matthews Avenue.

IOSHA officials said there were no reports of injury. But the state agency alleges Veolia failed to instruct employees to recognize and avoid hazards and failed to properly determine the location of a gas line.

Veolia had an informal conference with IOSHA, filed a petition for review and is further evaluating the issues in the safety order, said Veolia spokesman Paul Whitmore.

“All employees receive training on hazards and maintaining a safe workplace on a monthly basis and supervisors offer daily safety briefings,” he said.

Whitmore said Veolia’s safety performance “is posting its safest results ever,” recording eight injuries in 2009, among 400 employees and 750,000 hours worked, “outpacing Bureau of Labor statistics for the industry.”

Veolia manages Indianapolis Water under a long-term contract, although Mayor Greg Ballard in March announced plans to sell the city-owned utility to Indianapolis-based Citizens Energy in a $1.9 billion deal.

The proposed sale has sharply divided the City-County Council along party lines, with many Democrats preferring the city retain the utility and its oversight. Ballard, a Republican, said the sale would generate about $450 million for needed city infrastructure improvements.

Citizens Energy, which operates the city’s gas system and steam/chilled water operations, said it would engage Veolia’s expertise following a sale, although did not specify to what degree.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Say what?
    What's the frequency, Kenneth?
  • Hmm...
    Waitaminit. Citizens' is a not-for-profit public charitable trust originally started to operate the gas works and coking plant; so it would seem natural for them to continue to accumulate the city's utilities. As to hitting a gas line more than SIX feet down... Wasn't the first time, nor probably the last. You dig, you're digging blind - unless you have access to one of the military's ground-penetrating radars, anyway. You know ABOUT where anything is - until your shovel - or backhoe - "finds" it the hard way. Ooops! Gas lines aren't USUALLY six feet down; they don't freeze like water lines do. Pay to fix the gas line and go on. How many other times have utility workers found each others' underground plants the hard way? Only Holey Moley knows....

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT