IBJNews

State cites Veolia Water over safety concerns

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Veolia Water Indianapolis is challenging a proposed $13,500 penalty sought by the state for three “serious” safety violations involving an excavation last February at the University of Indianapolis campus.

The Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited the operator of the city’s water system after an excavator hit a gas line at a depth of about 6 feet at Hanna Avenue and Matthews Avenue.

IOSHA officials said there were no reports of injury. But the state agency alleges Veolia failed to instruct employees to recognize and avoid hazards and failed to properly determine the location of a gas line.

Veolia had an informal conference with IOSHA, filed a petition for review and is further evaluating the issues in the safety order, said Veolia spokesman Paul Whitmore.

“All employees receive training on hazards and maintaining a safe workplace on a monthly basis and supervisors offer daily safety briefings,” he said.

Whitmore said Veolia’s safety performance “is posting its safest results ever,” recording eight injuries in 2009, among 400 employees and 750,000 hours worked, “outpacing Bureau of Labor statistics for the industry.”

Veolia manages Indianapolis Water under a long-term contract, although Mayor Greg Ballard in March announced plans to sell the city-owned utility to Indianapolis-based Citizens Energy in a $1.9 billion deal.

The proposed sale has sharply divided the City-County Council along party lines, with many Democrats preferring the city retain the utility and its oversight. Ballard, a Republican, said the sale would generate about $450 million for needed city infrastructure improvements.

Citizens Energy, which operates the city’s gas system and steam/chilled water operations, said it would engage Veolia’s expertise following a sale, although did not specify to what degree.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Say what?
    What's the frequency, Kenneth?
  • Hmm...
    Waitaminit. Citizens' is a not-for-profit public charitable trust originally started to operate the gas works and coking plant; so it would seem natural for them to continue to accumulate the city's utilities. As to hitting a gas line more than SIX feet down... Wasn't the first time, nor probably the last. You dig, you're digging blind - unless you have access to one of the military's ground-penetrating radars, anyway. You know ABOUT where anything is - until your shovel - or backhoe - "finds" it the hard way. Ooops! Gas lines aren't USUALLY six feet down; they don't freeze like water lines do. Pay to fix the gas line and go on. How many other times have utility workers found each others' underground plants the hard way? Only Holey Moley knows....

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

ADVERTISEMENT