State firms up crowdfunding rules for businesses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana firms can use the Internet to raise up to $2 million in a single securities offering, and Hoosiers can invest up to $5,000 each online, according to rules the Indiana Secretary of State's office announced Tuesday.

The rules apply to a law the Indiana Legislature passed earlier this year that opened the door to businesses raising investments via the Internet—a process loosely known as "crowdfunding." The state passed the law to mirror similar legislation on the federal level.

Crowdfunding began as an online fundraising strategy to collect donations for not-for-profit, artistic and humanitarian projects. Indiana's new rules allow small businesses and entrepreneurs, for example, to sell equity stakes to investors online.

“It can be used in conjunction with other traditional financing options, but by using multiple investors, crowdfunding will allow the entrepreneur to stay in control of the vision and direction of the business,” Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson said Tuesday during a press conference at The Speak Easy, a co-working space for startups south of Broad Ripple.

“And it’s intended to be one more tool to help Indiana companies stay off the ground and be productive,” Lawson said.

State law previously barred companies from selling equity stakes or other securities online, unless it was done through a professional brokerage.

“It can be anything,” said Indiana Securities Commission Commissioner Carol Mihalik. "It can be an ice cream shop, a brewery. [If] I want to raise capital via non-traditional sources—my bank has only given me 'X' dollars and I need more—I may be able to use crowdfunding as way to get additional financing or my only financing."

Under the rules developed by the Secretary of State, only Indiana businesses may register to crowdfund investments, and only Indiana residents can invest.

Indiana’s rules apply to any type of securities sold online. Online investing sites in Indiana no longer need to be certified brokerages as long as they file with the state. Unlike brokerages, however, they cannot collect commissions on security sales—only flat fees. The website hosts also must maintain all records for five years.

The law also lifts requirements that companies could only raise money from accredited investors who met certain income thresholds set by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Lawson and Mihalik noted that companies will still need to meet many disclosure requirements.

All businesses need to provide a business plan and escrow agreement when they register to crowdfund their securities. And crowdfunding sites also must prominently note that private equity investments are high-risk and often illiquid.

“It’s full disclosure, like it has been in the past,” Mihalik said. “And so businesses need to be very careful to be sure the information they give is accurate.

“The best way to say it is: You say what you do and you do what you say. You can’t leave anything out that would let someone be uninformed about what the risk might be."



  • penalty
    what is the penalty for a CEO raising funds with misleading or absent critical information?
  • A good development...
    This is another tool that young entrepreneurs to utilize in order to raise capital for projects that avoids borrowing money from banks and large fees from brokerages. I hope that the state will provide a list of reputable securities dealers / sellers.
  • Lot's of Effort for Little Return
    At $5,000 maximum per investor per deal, the cap tables for some of these companies will be enormous. And the management of those larger numbers of investors will be rather burdensome for the entrepreneurs. The lower maximum makes sense, though, in order to provide a degree of protection for investors from potential crowdfunding scams.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing