State firms up crowdfunding rules for businesses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana firms can use the Internet to raise up to $2 million in a single securities offering, and Hoosiers can invest up to $5,000 each online, according to rules the Indiana Secretary of State's office announced Tuesday.

The rules apply to a law the Indiana Legislature passed earlier this year that opened the door to businesses raising investments via the Internet—a process loosely known as "crowdfunding." The state passed the law to mirror similar legislation on the federal level.

Crowdfunding began as an online fundraising strategy to collect donations for not-for-profit, artistic and humanitarian projects. Indiana's new rules allow small businesses and entrepreneurs, for example, to sell equity stakes to investors online.

“It can be used in conjunction with other traditional financing options, but by using multiple investors, crowdfunding will allow the entrepreneur to stay in control of the vision and direction of the business,” Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson said Tuesday during a press conference at The Speak Easy, a co-working space for startups south of Broad Ripple.

“And it’s intended to be one more tool to help Indiana companies stay off the ground and be productive,” Lawson said.

State law previously barred companies from selling equity stakes or other securities online, unless it was done through a professional brokerage.

“It can be anything,” said Indiana Securities Commission Commissioner Carol Mihalik. "It can be an ice cream shop, a brewery. [If] I want to raise capital via non-traditional sources—my bank has only given me 'X' dollars and I need more—I may be able to use crowdfunding as way to get additional financing or my only financing."

Under the rules developed by the Secretary of State, only Indiana businesses may register to crowdfund investments, and only Indiana residents can invest.

Indiana’s rules apply to any type of securities sold online. Online investing sites in Indiana no longer need to be certified brokerages as long as they file with the state. Unlike brokerages, however, they cannot collect commissions on security sales—only flat fees. The website hosts also must maintain all records for five years.

The law also lifts requirements that companies could only raise money from accredited investors who met certain income thresholds set by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Lawson and Mihalik noted that companies will still need to meet many disclosure requirements.

All businesses need to provide a business plan and escrow agreement when they register to crowdfund their securities. And crowdfunding sites also must prominently note that private equity investments are high-risk and often illiquid.

“It’s full disclosure, like it has been in the past,” Mihalik said. “And so businesses need to be very careful to be sure the information they give is accurate.

“The best way to say it is: You say what you do and you do what you say. You can’t leave anything out that would let someone be uninformed about what the risk might be."



  • penalty
    what is the penalty for a CEO raising funds with misleading or absent critical information?
  • A good development...
    This is another tool that young entrepreneurs to utilize in order to raise capital for projects that avoids borrowing money from banks and large fees from brokerages. I hope that the state will provide a list of reputable securities dealers / sellers.
  • Lot's of Effort for Little Return
    At $5,000 maximum per investor per deal, the cap tables for some of these companies will be enormous. And the management of those larger numbers of investors will be rather burdensome for the entrepreneurs. The lower maximum makes sense, though, in order to provide a degree of protection for investors from potential crowdfunding scams.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!