State green-lights deeper look into fuel costs at Duke plant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission will press forward with a deeper look into fuel costs that Duke Energy Indiana has reported for its new Edwardsport plant.

A separate state agency for utility consumers says the $3.5 billion plant, which began commercial production in June, consumed more energy than it produced during some periods in September, October and November.

The agency, the Office of the Utility Consumer Counselor, estimates that the negative generation cost Duke $1.5 million during those three months. It wants to block Duke's ability to reclaim those costs from its customers.

The office asked the IURC in March to grant more time for scrutiny of Duke's request to recover fuel costs. The IURC, which would approve cost recovery, has agreed to look into the matter further.

Duke has disagreed with the OUCC's assessment and its methodology for calculating the costs. A representative told the IURC during a recent hearing that the fuel costs were neither excessive nor unreasonable, according to a commission filing.

Edwardsport also shut down for 15 days during the three-month period for routine maintenance, Duke noted.

"The station is performing within the original start-up plan, and that activity during this testing, tuning, and optimization time period is important as it produces long-term benefits and efficiencies for the customer,” Duke told the IURC.

In minutes from the hearing, IURC officials generally agreed with Duke but concluded "the public interest is served by a detailed review of the underlying causes of the Edwardsport [negative generation]."

The three-month period in question came before Edwardsport’s production plummeted in January due to technical problems. The slump continued into February, because Duke moved up routine maintenance for the plant, the company said. Duke has said that production rebounded in March.

"When the plant went commercial in June, we estimated Edwardsport would build up to its long-term level of availability (the amount of time it is available to operate) over 15 months," spokeswoman Angeline Protogere said in an email. "It’s a large, complex project, and it has taken time to work out technical issues."

Duke Energy Indiana provides electricity to about 790,000 homes and businesses in Indiana. Parent firm Duke Energy Corp., based in Charlotte, N.C., operates dozens of power plants and serves 7.2 million electric retail customers in six states in the Southeast and Midwest.


  • Pig
    Is another pig in the poke concept by Mitch Daniel.
  • Solar is a Sure thing
    The IGCC-based unit at Edwardsport Coal Gasification plan will consume 1.7-1.9 million tons of coal per year and is projected 618 MW of base-load electricity. By comparison the existing $40 million solar farm by the Indianapolis Airport Produces 16.5 megawatt hours (MWh) per year, enough to power 1,800 homes . some quick math on that 3.5billion divided by 40 million: 3500000000/40000000= 87 solar farms like the one at the indianapolis airport. That would be over 1400MW (megawatts) per year, nearly twice the energy for the same amount of construction costs. Also interesting to note that wikipedia says coal-gas's heyday was 1850. sad face. Time to do some real reporting IBJ. This is a huge waste of money. Go Solar. ....and why don't you report on the huge wind farms in northern indiana. a farmer gets like 10,000$ a year for a turbine. average acre produces about 5,000$, so its a huge benefit for indiana. Indiana has been tricked by Duke energy.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1