IBJNews

State jobless rate climbs despite increase in jobs

Scott Olson
January 18, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana’s unemployment rate rose to 8.2 percent in December even though the state added 8,300 private-sector jobs during the month.

The Indiana Department of Workforce Development said Friday morning that the rate increased from 8.0 percent in November, as more than 7,000 unemployed Hoosiers resumed looking for work.

Overall, Indiana added 54,000 jobs in 2012, the best year in more than a decade, the state said, and private-sector employment rose to nearly 97 percent of pre-recession levels.

“As evidenced by our December employment numbers, Indiana experienced an exceptional year of job growth in 2012,” DWD Commissioner Scott B. Sanders said in a prepared statement. “The Hoosier state has increased private-sector employment by nearly 157,000 since July 2009, the low point of employment in our state, and has been a national leader in job growth during that period.”

Statewide non-farm employment in December totaled 3.1 million on a seasonally adjusted basis. A total of 267,046 people sought unemployment benefits, up from a revised 252,037 in November.

Indiana's December unemployment rate was higher than the national rate of 7.8 percent. In the Midwest, it was higher than the rate in Kentucky and Ohio, but lower than Illinois and Michigan.

Indiana’s jobless rate has been at 8 percent or above in all but two months since December 2008.

Job sectors showing gains in December were construction (4,300), leisure and hospitality (2,000), professional and business services (1,900) and financial activities (1,400).

The private educational and health services sector lost 700 jobs last month, the state said.

In the Indianapolis metro area, the non-seasonally adjusted jobless rate was 8 percent in December, down from 8.2 percent in December 2011. However, the area lost jobs, dropping to 889,966 in December from 902,158 a year earlier.

Comparisons of metro areas are more accurately made using the same months in prior years because the government does not adjust the figures for factory furloughs and other seasonal fluctuations.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Jobs
    The reason for the unbalance is due to high paying jobs are being replaced for low paying jobs. So the average American who use to work a $40,000 year job is now faced to working for $23-25,000 year job.Lets stop pissy-footin around here.
  • RIGHT TO WORK
    So the right to work is a failure? Thanks Mitch
  • Steve.......
    Steve Indiana has been an at-will employer forever. That is not why people lose their jobs. It's either because their company is not profitable or the employee has not shown that he/she is valuable to the oompany. In the world today, you need to continue to learn and improve yourself...and of course, work harder than the guy next to you.
  • Figures
    It is kinda messed up that my family wlll be homeless cause of the at will laws.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

    2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

    3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

    4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

    5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

    ADVERTISEMENT