IBJNews

State sues teachers' union for securities fraud

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita's office sued the Indiana State Teachers Association for securities fraud Wednesday, saying the teachers' union is unable to account for $23 million in funds.

The lawsuit is the latest problem to arise out of the ISTA Insurance Trust, which collapsed this summer after massive investment losses.

Filed in Marion Superior Court, the lawsuit alleges that ISTA offered unregistered securities to dozens of Indiana school corporations when it promised to create an insurance fund both pay their health claims and generate a return on the fund's reserves. ISTA officials acted as investment advisers without the proper licenses, according to the lawsuit, which also accuses them of co-mingling money meant for health benefits with other funds, including payments to a long-term disability plan.

The suit alleges the co-mingling led ISTA officials to lose track of $23 million.

ISTA spokesman Mark Shoup said it is "premature" to directly respond to the suit's allegations. He stressed that the ISTA is paying its 650 members who are covered by the long-term disability benefits plan.

The ISTA insurance trust also provided health benefits to more than 2,000 teachers. Their benefits are now being administered by the local office of UnitedHealthcare, a Minnesota-based health insurer.

"We continue to make the payments, and do what’s best for them," he said. "We’re just trying to pick up the pieces and move forward and do right by the people who have depended on the trust."

However, Rokita and his securities division chief, Chris Naylor, want a judge to freeze ISTA’s finances and appoint a receiver to account for all the school corporations’ invested funds. They asked for the freeze not to stop the distribution of the long-term disability benefits.

“The latest evidence indicates that ISTA is now offering these Indiana school corporations pennies on the dollar in an effort to wipe away their liability,” said Rokita in a statement. “The purpose of this action is to request that an independent third party be assigned to ensure transparent accounting and equitable distribution of any remaining funds, while not interrupting any payments being made to disabled teachers.”

In May, the Indiana Department of Insurance cracked down on the ISTA Insurance trust after an investigation found the value of the trust’s investments had plunged 55 percent in the previous 20 months, leaving it $67 million short of its liabilities.

After the revelations, ISTA’s parent organization, the National Education Association, assumed temporary control of the state-level operations—though not of its local affiliates. Rokita's lawsuit also names the NEA as a defendant.

The Insurance Department faulted ISTA’s former executive director, Warren Williams, and the trust’s investment adviser, Morgan Stanley's David Karandos.

During a nine-month stretch last year, Karandos made 4,000 trades involving the ISTA trust's investments. He also put large portions of the trust’s assets in hard-to-sell investments, such as stakes in private-equity deals and hedge funds.

Karandos and Williams made all investment decisions for the trust, according to a report by Indianapolis-based Noble Consulting Services, which examined the trust at the request of the Indiana Department of Insurance.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT