IBJNews

State unemployment rate climbs to 8.2 percent

Scott Olson
August 17, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana’s unemployment rate climbed to 8.2 percent in July, marking the second straight month the rate has increased.

The Indiana Department of Workforce Development said Friday morning that the July rate increased from 8 percent in June. It was 7.9 percent in May.

The rate slightly below the national rate of 8.3 percent.

The DWD, however, is taking issue with how the federal government calculates the state’s unemployment rate.

“We have raised several questions with the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics about discrepancies in June and July’s labor force data,” DWD Commissioner Scott B. Sanders said in a prepared statement. “The numbers seem to indicate nearly 46,000 Hoosiers went from gainfully employed in May to missing from the labor force in July, with no explanation.”

Indiana’s jobless rate has been at 8 percent or above in all but two month since December 2008. It was 9.2 percent a year ago.

Indiana added 3,300 private-sector jobs in July, the ninth straight month the state has reported an increase. So far this year, the state’s overall job-growth rate of 1.7 percent continues to exceed the national average of 1 percent, the state said.

Statewide non-farm employment in July totaled 2.9 million on a seasonally adjusted basis. A total of 264,569 sought unemployment benefits, down from a revised 265,433 in June.

Sectors showing employment gains in July included government (7,600 jobs) and construction (2,400 jobs).

The trade, transportation and utilities sector showed the biggest employment loss (1,200 jobs).

In the Indianapolis metro area, the non-seasonally adjusted jobless rate was 7.8 percent in July, down from 8.6 percent in July 2011.

Comparisons of metro areas are more accurately made using the same months in prior years because the government does not adjust the figures for factory furloughs and other seasonal fluctuations.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • fuzzy math
    This article reminds me that this administration lost and found almost a half of billion $'s. Fuzzy math, maybe!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. OK Larry, let's sign Lance, shore up the PG and let's get to the finals.

  2. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  3. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  4. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  5. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!

ADVERTISEMENT