IBJNews

State unemployment rate climbs to 8.2 percent

Scott Olson
August 17, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana’s unemployment rate climbed to 8.2 percent in July, marking the second straight month the rate has increased.

The Indiana Department of Workforce Development said Friday morning that the July rate increased from 8 percent in June. It was 7.9 percent in May.

The rate slightly below the national rate of 8.3 percent.

The DWD, however, is taking issue with how the federal government calculates the state’s unemployment rate.

“We have raised several questions with the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics about discrepancies in June and July’s labor force data,” DWD Commissioner Scott B. Sanders said in a prepared statement. “The numbers seem to indicate nearly 46,000 Hoosiers went from gainfully employed in May to missing from the labor force in July, with no explanation.”

Indiana’s jobless rate has been at 8 percent or above in all but two month since December 2008. It was 9.2 percent a year ago.

Indiana added 3,300 private-sector jobs in July, the ninth straight month the state has reported an increase. So far this year, the state’s overall job-growth rate of 1.7 percent continues to exceed the national average of 1 percent, the state said.

Statewide non-farm employment in July totaled 2.9 million on a seasonally adjusted basis. A total of 264,569 sought unemployment benefits, down from a revised 265,433 in June.

Sectors showing employment gains in July included government (7,600 jobs) and construction (2,400 jobs).

The trade, transportation and utilities sector showed the biggest employment loss (1,200 jobs).

In the Indianapolis metro area, the non-seasonally adjusted jobless rate was 7.8 percent in July, down from 8.6 percent in July 2011.

Comparisons of metro areas are more accurately made using the same months in prior years because the government does not adjust the figures for factory furloughs and other seasonal fluctuations.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • fuzzy math
    This article reminds me that this administration lost and found almost a half of billion $'s. Fuzzy math, maybe!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT