IBJNews

Steak n Shake paying $3.8M for Ober Building

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An affiliate of the Steak n Shake restaurant chain has agreed to pay $3.8 million to acquire downtown's Ober Building from the Capital Improvement Board of Marion County.

The proposed sale of the six-story office building at 107 S. Pennsylvania St. to Steak n Shake of Indianapolis Office Inc. is scheduled for review Sept. 5 by the Metropolitan Development Commission.

Indianapolis-based Steak n Shake, a subsidiary of the publicly traded San Antonio-based Biglari Holdings Inc., has its local offices in the Century Building on the opposite corner of Pennsylvania and Maryland streets from the Ober Building.

The restaurant chain likely will move its headquarters operations, including administrative offices, meeting space and a test kitchen, to the 1910 building named for C.S. Ober, a local businessman who founded Business Furniture Corp. and Stationers Inc.

Steak n Shake's lease for multiple floors in the Century Building expires next year, and that building is going through foreclosure, so the company's timing on buying the nearby 62,500-square-foot building makes sense.

A company official did not return a phone message left Tuesday morning.

The CIB had not publicized an asking price for the Ober Building, which it acquired for $5.5 million in 1999. In 2004, the Ober Building was appraised for a value ranging between $4.4 million and $4.8 million.

The CIB more recently has paid for two more appraisals, but did not disclose the results. The MDC agenda item says the purchase price is "not less than the average of the two appraisals."

The building's price seems "in line" based on its condition, location and market demand, according to a veteran office broker who did not participate in the deal.

The buyer is getting a building for less than half of the cost of replacing the space with a modern structure, but fixing it up to accommodate Steak n Shake's operations won't be cheap. "You're really paying for location," the broker said.

The Capital Improvement Board acquired the building because it wanted to control the properties around what is now known as Bankers Life Fieldhouse.

The building is about half-occupied, with such tenants as Ratio Architects and NuOrbit Media paying rent of roughly $14 to $15 per square foot, CIB records show. The Ober Building generated total operating revenue last year of $557,000 and produced a profit of nearly $316,000.

The CIB will use the sale to plug a $2 million funding hole that will open up next year for the Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association due to the expiration of a grant from Merrillville-based White Lodging Services Corp., which owns the new JW Marriott hotel in downtown Indianapolis.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Can't wait to move
    The elevators in the Century Building are very old and cost to replace is around $800-$1M. I ride in these elevators every day and they get stuck, go haywire, etc. Good luck to the new owners and good riddance!
  • CIB's budget is
    There is something to be said for reconciling long-term debt with long-term solutions. There is also something to be said for keeping options open to capitalize on opportunity. Does anyone really think that the CIB will be in the same position they are today in 5 years?
  • Ok
    But what will we do to fund ICVA's $2 million funding gap in two years? And what will we do to provide the Pacers with another round of $10 million+ annual subsidies next year?
  • Not sure how many of you have been paying attention the last 5 years, but property values have dropped considerably since the last appraisal in 2004. Now if any of you want to buy my house for its appraised value in 2004, you are welcome to it.
  • That's why it's called a
    Right place, right time, right price. That's what it's all about. Gee whiz - if anyone that's upset about it knew that it was so cashflow positive I guess you all woulda bought it, huh? Gimme a break.
  • Math
    If the property has been cash flow positive many of the last 13 years, it wouldn't be selling at a $1.7mm loss would it? If they've made $300k in profit since purchase, they are making $2mm+ in profit at the end of the day. I'm sure it isn't that much, but you have to take cash flow over the course of ownership into consideration...
  • Are you kidding?!
    CIB selling nickles for 4 cents - where do I get in line... Tax payers loose again!
  • South, not north
    I think there is a typo in this story. Don't you mean 107 S. Pennsylvania, not 107 N. Penn?
  • Address correction?
    The address might be 107 South (not North) Penn...
  • Doesnt' Make Sense
    So we taxpayers are selling a building which produced a $316,000 profit last year for a 1.7 million loss? No wonder the CIB loses money every year.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT