IBJNews

Stifel, Rokita reach settlement in auction-rate securities case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

St. Louis-based money management firm Stifel, Nicolaus and Co., whose clients include some of Indiana’s wealthiest people, has reached a settlement agreement with Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita over the company’s handling of $54 million in auction-rate securities sold here.

The Indiana Securities Division of Rokita’s office filed an administrative complaint against Stifel in October, alleging securities fraud, failure to properly supervise and train salespeople, and that the investments were not suitable for Stifel’s customers. The complaint alleged that Stifel failed to disclose the risks associated with auction-rate securities.

The global auction-rate market collapsed in February 2008. According to Rokita’s office, 142 Indiana investors held $54 million in auction-rate securities sold by Stifel.

Rokita’s office announced late this afternoon that Indiana residents who purchased auction-rate securities from Stifel will regain complete access to their investments within the next 24 months under the settlement. It was part of a global settlement coordinated through the North American Securities Administrators Association.

Auction-rate securities are bonds whose interest rates are meant to be reset regularly at daily, weekly or monthly auctions. Many financial firms marketed them as safe, liquid and cash-like investments. But when credit markets seized up as the recession deepened, auctions began to fail, freezing the $200 billion global market and leaving investors unable to access their money.

Because only a handful of previous auctions ever had failed, many investors considered the securities a safe form of temporary financing—essentially a better-yielding alternative to money market accounts.

Stifel maintained its innocence from the start of Rokita’s investigation. And it voluntarily promised to buy back all its clients’ auction-rate securities over three years—a deal it claims 100 percent of its Indiana clients had already accepted before Rokita filed his complaint.

“Hindsight’s always 20/20,” Stifel CEO Ronald Kruszewski told IBJ in October. “No one anticipated a complete market collapse. It’s just that simple. And to say you committed fraud by not disclosing an unknown risk can only be true with the benefit of hindsight.”

Under the settlement, Stifel will repurchase from each eligible Indiana investor the greater of $25,000 or 10 percent of their auction-rate holdings by Jan. 15, 2010. Stifel will then continue making accelerated payments to investors over the next two years. All Stifel investors who had $150,000 or less tied up in auction-rate securities will be made whole by Dec. 31, 2010, and all remaining investors will regain complete control of their investments by the end of 2011.

Stifel had previously pledged to pay back all its auction-rate investors by June 2012.

Under the settlement, Stifel has also agreed to hire an outside consultant to review and make recommendations about its internal supervisory and compliance policies and procedures related to the sale of non-conventional investments.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Tim Morrison's Are No Larger
    are they?

  • Real tought, Rokita
    Yeah, Rokita, you really got 'em didn't ya. While you were slapping Jeff and Dave on the hand they are laughing behind your back for all those trades on Brightpoint et al that you don't have the balls to investigate.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT