Stonegate raises $115M to fund jumbo mortgage expansion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Stonegate Mortgage Corp., the closely held lender that originated almost twice as much debt last quarter as in all of 2011, sold $115 million of common shares in a private offering to continue its expansion, it announced Wednesday.

The company will use the funds to fuel originations of loans not intended for government-backed programs, as well as to build its portfolio of servicing contracts, CEO Jim Cutillo said in a telephone interview. After recently starting to grant such jumbo mortgages directly to consumers, the Indianapolis-based firm plans to offer the product to its brokers and correspondents this month, he said.

Stonegate joins lenders such as W.J. Bradley Mortgage Capital LLC, Shellpoint Partners LLC and Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust with plans to start contributing to a slow thaw in sales of so-called non-agency mortgage bonds. The market will grow more important as U.S.-controlled Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac raise their guarantee fees to scale back the government’s role in financing about 90 percent of new loans, Cutillo said.

“You can start to see the tide turning,” he said. “People are going to be scrambling to figure out what their non-agency strategies are.”

FBR & Co managed the share sale for Stonegate, which now services $5.7 billion of mortgages and originated about $1.8 billion last quarter, $3.5 billion last year and $1 billion in 2011. Its volumes may reach $10 billion this year, Cutillo said.

Stonegate, ranked as one of the fastest-growing businesses in the Indianapolis area, told IBJ in March that it was negotiating to raise a new round of private equity.

While non-agency issuance has grown to about $6 billion this year from $3.5 billion in all of 2012, Barclays Plc analysts said in a report Tuesday that the expansion will be slow to accelerate, and they maintained a 2013 forecast of $12 billion to $15 billion. Issuance peaked at about $1.2 trillion in each of 2005 and 2006, before the debt’s tumbling values as foreclosures soared helped cause a global financial crisis.

The revival will be limited by widening spreads on the top- rated portions of transactions as issuance expands, agency bond- guarantee fees low enough to offer larger profits to lenders and bank demand for the safest loans, the analysts led by Sandeep Bordia said.

Still, over the next 12 to 18 months, “non-agencies could become competitive in a broader part of the market,” especially if the size of debt that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can finance drops and regulators finish work on new rules, they wrote.

Jumbo home loans are those larger than allowed in government-supported programs, currently as much as $729,750 for single-family properties in high-cost areas. For Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans with the lowest costs for borrowers using 20 percent down payments, limits range from $417,000 to $625,500.

Stonegate expects loans in that expanded range to also soon make their way into the non-agency market, Cutillo said. The firm’s potential bonds will offer something new for investors because it works with about 700 small and mid-size originators across the country, such as “the guy on Main Street in Oklahoma who doesn’t really have anybody to sell to,” he said.

With recent deals, the “geographical concentration remains a concern,” with much of the debt tied to San Francisco and Los Angeles, the Barclays analysts said. The risks are limited by the high quality of the mortgages, they said.

Stonegate, which raised $25 million in 2012 from private-equity firm Long Ridge Equity Partners, is now “institutionally held” by investors including insurers, real-estate investment trusts and hedge funds, Cutillo said. The firm last year acquired warehouse lender NattyMac from Guggenheim Partners, which will also help in its non-agency expansion, he said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.