Study: Quality, costs better at big practices

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It looks like bigger is better when it comes to physician practices. A new study finds that large, multispecialty practices provides higher-quality care at slightly lower cost than their smaller compatriots.

The study found that quality was 5 percent to 15 percent higher at large, multispecialty practices than at small group practices.  Average costs were 3.6 percent lower, or $272 annually per patient.

The findings were published in the May issue of the journal Health Affairs. The study was conducted by Dartmouth University researchers using claims data from the federal Medicare insurance program for patients in 22 markets.

In the Indianapolis area, some of the largest physician practices are getting bigger. On Jan. 1, Indianapolis Neurosurgery Group merged with the IU Department of Neurology to form Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, which includes 35 physicians.

The Indiana Clinic is trying to combine physician practices of Methodist Hospital and the Indiana University School of Medicine—and a few outsiders—into a 1,500-doctor practice by 2011. So far, 415 are on board.

The St. Vincent Physician Network added more than 30 doctors from the summer of 2008 to the summer of 2009. Now St. Vincent has agreed to acquire The Care Group—a practice of 130 cardiology and primary care doctors—in a deal that would double the amount of physicians employed by St. Vincent.

Physician accountants say many other practices have been growing by adding physicians one or two at a time.

The main factors forcing such mergers is declining reimbursement rates from the federal Medicare program for some specialist physicians (although primary care docs are getting an increase) as well as the high cost doctors face to add electronic medical systems before Medicare penalties begin in 2015.

The Dartmouth researchers suggested large, multispecialty physician practices are well positioned to act as the “accountable care organizations” called for by the new health care reform law, signed by President Obama in March.

The law authorizes the Medicare program to contract with certain health care providers—most likely a combination of a physician group and a hospital—to come up with quality-improving and cost-saving methods. Then Medicare would give some of the savings as a bonus payment to the doctors and hospitals.

"The findings of this study by [the Dartmouth researchers] suggest that large multispecialty medical groups already provide higher-quality, lower-cost care, and would be well positioned to assume the role of accountable care organizations,” Health Affairs editor Susan Dentzer said in a statement. “By continuing to provide higher quality care at lower cost, they could go a long way toward bending the cost curve and achieving other goals of health system reform."


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.