Study: Quality, costs better at big practices

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It looks like bigger is better when it comes to physician practices. A new study finds that large, multispecialty practices provides higher-quality care at slightly lower cost than their smaller compatriots.

The study found that quality was 5 percent to 15 percent higher at large, multispecialty practices than at small group practices.  Average costs were 3.6 percent lower, or $272 annually per patient.

The findings were published in the May issue of the journal Health Affairs. The study was conducted by Dartmouth University researchers using claims data from the federal Medicare insurance program for patients in 22 markets.

In the Indianapolis area, some of the largest physician practices are getting bigger. On Jan. 1, Indianapolis Neurosurgery Group merged with the IU Department of Neurology to form Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, which includes 35 physicians.

The Indiana Clinic is trying to combine physician practices of Methodist Hospital and the Indiana University School of Medicine—and a few outsiders—into a 1,500-doctor practice by 2011. So far, 415 are on board.

The St. Vincent Physician Network added more than 30 doctors from the summer of 2008 to the summer of 2009. Now St. Vincent has agreed to acquire The Care Group—a practice of 130 cardiology and primary care doctors—in a deal that would double the amount of physicians employed by St. Vincent.

Physician accountants say many other practices have been growing by adding physicians one or two at a time.

The main factors forcing such mergers is declining reimbursement rates from the federal Medicare program for some specialist physicians (although primary care docs are getting an increase) as well as the high cost doctors face to add electronic medical systems before Medicare penalties begin in 2015.

The Dartmouth researchers suggested large, multispecialty physician practices are well positioned to act as the “accountable care organizations” called for by the new health care reform law, signed by President Obama in March.

The law authorizes the Medicare program to contract with certain health care providers—most likely a combination of a physician group and a hospital—to come up with quality-improving and cost-saving methods. Then Medicare would give some of the savings as a bonus payment to the doctors and hospitals.

"The findings of this study by [the Dartmouth researchers] suggest that large multispecialty medical groups already provide higher-quality, lower-cost care, and would be well positioned to assume the role of accountable care organizations,” Health Affairs editor Susan Dentzer said in a statement. “By continuing to provide higher quality care at lower cost, they could go a long way toward bending the cost curve and achieving other goals of health system reform."


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............