IBJNews

Study: Urban tax money subsidizes rural counties

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A study released Tuesday morning by the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute shows residents in metropolitan counties subsidize their rural counterparts by paying more in state taxes than they receive in benefits.

While the results may not be unexpected, they demonstrate for the first time in Indiana the disparity in state tax collections and distributions among urban and rural counties, IFPI President John Ketzenberger said.

“The outcome is not surprising, but it does show what has long been suspected,” he said. “And there’s some value in that.”

Overall, taxpayers in 46 metropolitan counties paid 82.5 percent of the taxes, or $11.3 billion, and received 76.7 percent, or $10.5 billion in expenditures, the study said.

The disparity is equally pronounced in the 10-county Indianapolis metropolitan area. Residents there paid 33.5 percent, or $4.6 billion, of total state taxes and received 28 percent, or $3.8 billion, back.

Still, William J. Rieber, an economics professor at Butler University’s College of Business, said the method in which states distribute tax dollars is justified.

“Rural areas don’t have the same infrastructure as urban areas do, so they often need additional help,” Rieber said. “To some extent, we’re in the same state, and we’re all in this together.”

The Indiana study is consistent with the results from other states that examined the distribution of state government finances, the fiscal policy institute said in its report.

Steuben, Kosciusko, Adams and Dubois are the only non-urban counties that collected more tax revenue than they got back from the state.

Steuben County in northeast Indiana is bordered by Michigan and Ohio, two states that have higher gasoline and cigarette taxes than Indiana. As a result, the county collects a larger share of cigarette and gasoline tax revenue.

“You often hear in the Legislature about raising the cigarette tax and the gas tax,” Ketzenberger said. “Some people will say that will hurt border counties, and this bears this out a bit.”

Kosciusko, Adams and Dubois counties have a large number of residents working in a metropolitan area with relatively high household incomes and therefore paid more taxes than other rural areas, the study said.

On a per-capita basis, residents of Vanderburgh County in southwestern Indiana paid the most in state taxes when compared to expenditures, while Cass County in the north-central part of the state received the most benefits.

In fiscal 2009, which ended June 30, Indiana collected about $25.5 billion in total state revenue, of which it allocated $13.7 billion to the 92 counties.

State taxes accounted for roughly 55 percent of Indiana’s revenue in the fiscal year, followed by federal aid at 34 percent, and various state fees at 11 percent.

The sales tax is the largest source of state revenue and generated $6.2 billion in the fiscal year. Individual income taxes, which generated $4.3 billion, were the next largest source. Gasoline and other fuel taxes accounted for almost $800 million.

Indiana allocates spending of tax revenue through roughly 550 separate funds, ranging from K-12 education spending ($4.6 billion) to the preservation and display of the state’s Civil War battle flags ($38,000).

The Ball State University Center for Business and Economic Research compiled the results for the study.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT