Study: Urban tax money subsidizes rural counties

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A study released Tuesday morning by the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute shows residents in metropolitan counties subsidize their rural counterparts by paying more in state taxes than they receive in benefits.

While the results may not be unexpected, they demonstrate for the first time in Indiana the disparity in state tax collections and distributions among urban and rural counties, IFPI President John Ketzenberger said.

“The outcome is not surprising, but it does show what has long been suspected,” he said. “And there’s some value in that.”

Overall, taxpayers in 46 metropolitan counties paid 82.5 percent of the taxes, or $11.3 billion, and received 76.7 percent, or $10.5 billion in expenditures, the study said.

The disparity is equally pronounced in the 10-county Indianapolis metropolitan area. Residents there paid 33.5 percent, or $4.6 billion, of total state taxes and received 28 percent, or $3.8 billion, back.

Still, William J. Rieber, an economics professor at Butler University’s College of Business, said the method in which states distribute tax dollars is justified.

“Rural areas don’t have the same infrastructure as urban areas do, so they often need additional help,” Rieber said. “To some extent, we’re in the same state, and we’re all in this together.”

The Indiana study is consistent with the results from other states that examined the distribution of state government finances, the fiscal policy institute said in its report.

Steuben, Kosciusko, Adams and Dubois are the only non-urban counties that collected more tax revenue than they got back from the state.

Steuben County in northeast Indiana is bordered by Michigan and Ohio, two states that have higher gasoline and cigarette taxes than Indiana. As a result, the county collects a larger share of cigarette and gasoline tax revenue.

“You often hear in the Legislature about raising the cigarette tax and the gas tax,” Ketzenberger said. “Some people will say that will hurt border counties, and this bears this out a bit.”

Kosciusko, Adams and Dubois counties have a large number of residents working in a metropolitan area with relatively high household incomes and therefore paid more taxes than other rural areas, the study said.

On a per-capita basis, residents of Vanderburgh County in southwestern Indiana paid the most in state taxes when compared to expenditures, while Cass County in the north-central part of the state received the most benefits.

In fiscal 2009, which ended June 30, Indiana collected about $25.5 billion in total state revenue, of which it allocated $13.7 billion to the 92 counties.

State taxes accounted for roughly 55 percent of Indiana’s revenue in the fiscal year, followed by federal aid at 34 percent, and various state fees at 11 percent.

The sales tax is the largest source of state revenue and generated $6.2 billion in the fiscal year. Individual income taxes, which generated $4.3 billion, were the next largest source. Gasoline and other fuel taxes accounted for almost $800 million.

Indiana allocates spending of tax revenue through roughly 550 separate funds, ranging from K-12 education spending ($4.6 billion) to the preservation and display of the state’s Civil War battle flags ($38,000).

The Ball State University Center for Business and Economic Research compiled the results for the study.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.