IBJNews

Superintendent race a showdown over school changes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A traditionally sleepy race for Indiana's top elected school position has turned into a referendum on education policies that are endorsed by conservatives across the country.

Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett, a Republican, earned a national reputation by helping Gov. Mitch Daniels push through a 2011 legislative agenda that included tying teachers' pay to student performance, limiting teacher union contracts to wages and benefits, and expanding charter schools and what has become the country's largest school voucher program.

"This is definitely being watched nationally as a referendum on reform. If Tony Bennett can push this kind of aggressive reform agenda and win, it will give a big lift to other politicians eager to enact similar reforms," said Mike Petrilli, executive vice president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a conservative education think tank.

But Bennett is under siege from teachers who think they're unfairly being blamed for failing schools. The loudest voice belongs to his opponent, Democrat Glenda Ritz, a veteran educator who claims Bennett's agenda is a thinly veiled attempt to replace public schools with for-profit operations — regardless of results.

Ritz claims widespread grassroots support, but financially, she is being outgunned. Her campaign has raised about $200,000 to date, about the same amount as a single contribution to Bennett's campaign in July by Wal-Mart heiress Alice Walton of Arizona. Bennett's last report showed his campaign has raised about $1.5 million, most of it since July 1.

While Ritz's slimly funded campaign relies heavily on social media for word-of-mouth support, Bennett has already been able afford television advertising.

"Most teachers wanted to support (Ritz) just because she wasn't Tony Bennett," said Randy LePage, who teaches physical education at Wabash High School in northern Indiana.

Ritz has criticized Bennett for collecting out-of-state money she says comes from wealthy donors who back school privatization — Walton included — but the majority of Bennett's contributions come from within Indiana and tend to be hundreds of dollars larger than those received by Ritz.

"We have received some large contributions from out of state," Bennett conceded. But he attributes that to the buzz generated by Indiana's education overhaul, which he says has made the state a model for reform.

"It is (a model), but that's not good," said Dr. James P. Comer, a Yale professor who works with the Forum for Education and Democracy, a liberal education think tank. "There's no evidence those approaches work, especially for poor kids."

Critics say standardized testing works fine for children from middle- and upper-class families, but breaks down when it comes to serving less fortunate kids.

Studies on whether test scores increase when teachers get paid for performance are inconclusive. A recent study of teachers in an Illinois district found that it does, while other recent studies have found little or no benefit.

"The core issue is Indiana is the state where education reform has been met with academic achievement, and we believe we have a great foundation on which to build," Bennett said.

It's a foundation built largely on standardized testing, a practice Bennett defends but which Ritz maintains is depriving students of a deeper education.

Bennett points to an 8 percent improvement in standardized test scores over the past three years, but Ritz claims those measurements are skewed because the cutoff scores were changed .

"We signed up to teach, we didn't sign up to teach to test. And that's all that anybody's looking at," said Ritz, who is an award-winning teacher in Indianapolis.

Ritz's central concern, however, is that Bennett's policies will replace local control of schools with a state bureaucracy, opening the doors of public education to private companies whose main interest is in profits, not students.

Nate Schnellenberger, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, which backs Ritz, shares her concern.

"We don't believe that schools should be turned into for-profit schools," Schnellenberger said. "Schools are there to serve the public and students, but not to be for-profit opportunities for in-state or out-of-state companies," he added.

Bennett, a former public school administrator, teacher and basketball coach, maintains that competition will make public schools better. Private companies that step in via vouchers or take over failing schools are still obligated to make the grade, he says.

"My bottom line is that students learn. And these companies have a very clear understanding that I will get my bottom line before they get their bottom line," Bennett said.

"I believe it's working," he said of the state's education overhaul. "But we have to remember, results are never final and reform is never finished."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Too little, too late
    As the old saying goes. I went to Lawrence Township schools in the 70s. The "education" I was presented in junior high and high school was a joke. Example, we were made to sing songs by The Byrds in social studies. Hello?! The math my grade schooler does now is harder than what I had in junior high. I would LOVE to be of school age with the opportunity to go to a voucher based school with all the choices and opportunities available. Where teachers are motivated. Where the status quo doesn't exist. Where courses are stimulating. Where teacher and student results are demanded and expected. What I find to be a complete travesty is that IPS gets as much money per student as many private/charter schools. Where are the choices? Where is the discipline? Where are the results? Indiana State Public Schools have put themselves in this position to be challenged by their DECADES long ineptitude and their continued ignorance of reality. You've had your chance IPS et al. You blew it! You chose to throw money at the problem and did it badly. You chose to let the inmates (am I talking about the students, or the teachers?) run the asylum and they did. You chose to pander to the lowest common denominator and you made everyone dumber. You chose to remove discipline and structure from education and you received chaos. Every choice you made "in the best interest of the child" bs was wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong. Time for the whiners and criers to move along and let business take over. Yes, business' goal is to make a profit. But that means they do not put up with ignorance and ineptitude. Business' have measurables. Business' have metrics. Business have expected outcomes. Business get results or they go away. Public schools can fail and fail and fail and fail....
  • Bennett Violates Law in Attacking Teachers
    In his continued attack against public school teachers and especially the ISTA, Dr. Bennett clearly and willfully tried to violate state law to end labor agreements between schools and their teachers. This philosophy of attacking teacher's unions completely contradicts his own doctoral thesis where he PROVED teacher's unions do not negatively impact the operations of schools. "Judge McCarty cited several instances where Dr. Bennett’s mandated contract violated state law, citing Dr. Bennett’s teacher's form at one point as “unconscionable in that it gives school corporations the authority to unilaterally modify the number of days and hours that a teacher must work, but it does not require the school corporation to pay for the additional labor or any other additional consideration.” Judge McCarty's ruling stated, “The Court further orders that Dr. Bennett notify all school corporations in Indiana that they should not and cannot use the regular teacher’s form at issue in this case, and also forward a copy of this Summary Judgment Order to all school corporations in Indiana.” And the biggest fib of all from the State Superintendent: ""We have received some large contributions from out of state," Bennett conceded. But he attributes that to the buzz generated by Indiana's education overhaul, which he says has made the state a model for reform." Nothing could be further from the truth. These "Investors" want a piece of the for profit pie TB is cooking up here in Indiana and has nothing to do with being a state model. So "buzz" somehow generates $1000's for his campaign? BS! The only time I've heard of a "buzz" creating $1000's is the one generated by the use and sale of drugs! It's time to put students first and not for profit charter school companies and investors as well as testing companies!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

    2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

    3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

    4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

    5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.

    ADVERTISEMENT