Supreme Court allows Fishers to pursue reorganization

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the town of Fishers’ ability to reorganize with Fall Creek Township and merge into a single city.

The decision stems from a lawsuit filed in federal court by three Fishers residents who contested a 2010 recommendation by an independent study group that would strip the right of voters to elect a mayor. Under the proposal, council members would appoint a mayor.

The Supreme Court decision allows the town to proceed with a Nov. 6 referendum in which voters will have the opportunity to choose among three options for the future of Fishers: to remain a town, to merge with the township into a so-called modern city or to become a traditional city like any other.

The study group consisting of both town and township residents recommended the modern-city structure. If approved by voters, Fishers could be classified as a modern city and would be co-governed by nine council members and a mayor.

Fishers does not have a mayor and instead has a town manager to oversee city operations. The town manager position would remain in place under the modern-city proposal, Council President Scott Faultless said in a prepared statement.

“Because the mayor would be elected within the council, the modern city plan allows the council to vest as much executive authority in the mayor as is necessary and reasonable,” he said. “The significant decisions affecting our community would be made by building consensus amongst council members, not by one person.”

Residents who brought the lawsuit opposed the reorganization plan, arguing that if voters approve the modern-city proposal, Fishers would be the only city in the state with an appointed mayor.

In their decision, justices said state law allows a municipality to reorganize into a city even though the reorganization plan provides for a city council elected at large and a city mayor appointed by the council.

Fishers officials say the reorganization plan would enable the town to save more than $1 million in taxpayer dollars by merging the township and the town.

The proposal would give all residents of Fall Creek Township the right to vote, the right to run for city council and the right to participate in all municipal boards and commissions.

According to 2010 census figures, Fishers has 76,794 residents.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.