IBJNews

Survey: Many hospital patients in dark about debt-relief options

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A survey of Marion County residents found that 80 percent of respondents owe money to a local hospital—and about half of them say they were never informed about the availability of charity care or payment plans.

The non-scientific assessment does not appear to be drawn from a random sample of residents, meaning Hoosiers with hospital debt may have been more likely to respond than those without.

Nevertheless, the groups who conducted the survey say it points up the problematic prevalence of medical debt and the need for hospitals to do a better job making charity care available.

Not-for-profit hospitals have been under scrutiny from Congress for much of the past decade because of concerns that the amount of free care they provide is not enough to justify their exemptions from income taxes.

“Medical debt is a huge problem in Indianapolis that is putting many families at risk of losing their life-long savings, homes, credit ratings and futures,” Beryl Cohen, author of a report about the survey findings, said in a statement. “Hospitals must step up and do better jobs of letting patients know what help might be available.”

Cohen works for the Indianapolis-based Citizens Action Coalition Education Fund, a consumer advocacy organization. The survey also was supported by Indiana Legal Services, a local not-for-profit law firm, and Community Catalyst, a national consumer advocacy organization based in Boston.

Their findings were based on 547 responses collected since September at health fairs, block parties and other community events, as well as through door-to-door canvassing.

Among all respondents, 440 owed money to at least one hospital. The amount of debt averaged $23,000 per person.

When those bills were incurred, 251 of 500 respondents said they were told about a payment plan, discounts for the uninsured or under-insured, or told how to apply for a government health insurance program, such as Medicare or Medicaid.

But the other half of respondents said hospital personnel told them about none of these programs.

The survey included patients who had received care at Clarian Health’s Methodist, Indiana University and Riley hospitals; Community Health Network’s East, North and South hospitals; St. Francis Hospital & Health Centers’ Beech Grove and Indianapolis hospitals; and St. Vincent Indianapolis Hospital.

Cohen said Citizens Action Coalition and Indiana Legal Services want to partner with those hospitals to improve their community benefit and charity care programs.

“These programs must not continue to be the best-kept secret,” Cohen said.

As IBJ reported earlier this month, Indianapolis-area hospital systems saw their amounts of uncompensated care fall last year after steep rises in 2008. But continued high unemployment augurs for another increase this year.

Clarian Health’s combination of unpaid bills and free care for the poor dipped ever so slightly to $167.4 million last year, compared with $168.1 million the year before.

St. Vincent Health recorded charity care and bad debts of $128.5 million last year, down more than 7 percent from the previous year’s total of $138.4 million.

At Sisters of St. Francis Health Services Inc., charity care and bad debts totaled $92.1 million, down more than 12 percent from the prior year’s $100.4 million. Three of the 12 hospitals operated by the Mishawaka-based chain are in the Indianapolis area.

Only Community Health Network saw its charity care and bad debt rise. The four-hospital chain recorded $79.1 million in those categories last year, up 2 percent from the previous year’s total of $77.5 million.

“We’ve seen more people in charity care or taking advantage of charity care or working out more structured payment programs,” said Joel Hoff, senior vice president for administrative services at Sisters of St. Francis.

All four hospital systems saw charity and bad debt spike in 2008 as the recession set in and unemployment rose. The increases ranged from 18 percent at Community to 25 percent at Clarian.

Most hospitals waive the bills of patients making less than twice the federal poverty limit. For those with incomes above that threshold, unpaid bills are classified as bad debt.


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Some things never change
    Years ago the only time the St Vincent social work dept contacted my husband who was in the hospital for a total of 4 weeks over a 2-3 month period was once to find out who was going to pay the bill. Never a single word from the social work dept on help with bills for hospital, dr., food or housing for his family.
  • Hospitals Should Lose Non-Profit Tax Exemption
    The reason their charity healthcare amounts are down year over year ( in the worse economy since the great depression) is because they ship people off to taxpayer funded Wishard at any hint of eligibility.

    This is happening as these same hospitals spend billions building "for profit" hospitals all over the state.

Post a comment to this story

captcha
Please enter the text you see above:
Not sure? Give me another.

Sponsored by

IBJ on Facebook & Twitter

facebook - twitter
IBJ Healthcare IBJ The Score IBJ News IBJ
                        Property Lines IBJ
                        Newstalk IBJ Dining IBJ Lists IBJ Arts
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Your argument is one that is dated and irrelevant at this point. Our incredulous looks at your brotherhood of autoworkers is that you would forego working for a lessor amount and be unemployed while many are longing for employment! So while you use your big words to sound smart, the base question still is; do you want a job, or not?

    You can cloud the issue or clarify it. There is no "high road" because the world you are pining away for doesn't exist anymore. Ask the foundry workers of Chrysler. Ask the Navistar people. Ask the...oh, never mind. The list is too long. Either right size the labor costs or be left in the dust.

    By the way, there are "foreign" cars that have a higher percentage of manufactured parts and assembly labor from the U.S.A. on the road today than some models that are made by the Big 3...And last I checked they employ more Hoosiers too, so you may be barking up the wrong tree.

  2. I once lived in Indy but now live in Boston. I hav a brother and a sister who live in Carmel. Carmel is a joke. The arts district and city center feel soooo contrived its silly. How do we know it is the arts district... because they put up a sign that says so! I can go on about what an abomination the town is, but instead I will just say you are in for a rude awakening when your property taxes go up and you cant sell your house.

  3. There have been (and still are) a lot of online resources for keeping online address books (most social networking sites include), but Plaxo is definitely one of the cleanest, most simple I have seen. Good find. Don. http://www.viewcaster.net/

  4. I see the attendance at Kentucky was as embarrassing or worse than 99% percent of the other "Sacred Cows" that Mr. Bernard is chopping due to alleged promoter lack of promotion.

    How much longer is the IRL gonna try and pull the wool over the eyes of the AOW world?

    Mr. Bernard must realize the fans and potential fans know this is a sham. STOP wasting your time....the IRL product is CRAP product, with watered down BS racing. Attendance and TV rating PROVE that. And, the IRL wants to hike sanction fees....

    OH, the question is raised in the midst of the recent IRL celebration of the 200th IRL race (which convienently leaves out CART/CCWS records and the long history records of INDY etc), is this the 16th IZOD Indy Car Series 500 or is it the 100th indy 500? it appears the speedway is manipulating statistics and historical data to make it appear the IRL has been around since 1911.

    And you wonder why the AOW fanbase doesn't trust the lying control base of this sport?

    Hey, Randy, keep on insulting us. Even NASCAR delineates between the Modern era, appearently begun in 1979. Guess what IRL series was active in 1979? Whens the IRL "Modern series" begun? 1911, 1979, 1996, 2008? Fix it chump.

  5. Maybe you should try reading the actual proposal. There was an ulterior motive to this proposal, to ban electronic cigarettes. Minimal research clearly shows that electronic cigarettes are 99% safer, do not emit second hand smoke, and contain 4,000-11,000(brand dependent) LESS TOXINS. Anti-smoking groups, publicly funded by big pharma and big tobacco, have issued false reports of the contents of these products. Considering the much lower cost, and the FACT that an increasingly large number of people are switching to electronic cigarettes and are able to quit smoking even after years of trying and failing with the gums, patches, etc. produced by huge pharmaceutical companies. Naturally the FDA is in an uproar, our health plans are funded by tobacco taxes, they donâ??t WANT people to quit smoking! Do a little research on who funds ASH, one of the largest anti-smoking groups and most vocal on ecigarettes, big pharma and big tobacco. Their leader, a self proclaimed billionaire, pulls in over $200,000 a year from ASH alone, so he is basically paid by the tobacco and pharmaceutical industries. Where does his interest lie?
    This campaign is no longer â??anti-smokingâ??, it is â??anti-smokerâ??. These groups are no longer anti-smoking groups, they are haters and are power hungry. Power=big bucks.
    If you must vote on an anti-smoking proposal, please ask them to eliminate the electronic cigarette from the bill. These products are saving lives, and I know this for a fact. I switched to ecigarettes after smoking for over 25 years and can taste, smell and breath again, and do not desire to go back to traditional cigarettes just to support and already bloated industry, nor do I wish to use pharmaceuticals that cause thoughts of suicide, nightmares, and countless other harmful side effects. The other pharmaceutical alternatives are to directly ingest nicotine, or to absorb it through the skin. No thanks.
    Research before support please.

ADVERTISEMENT