IBJNews

Survey shows dissatisfaction with Indianapolis Public Schools

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A slight majority of more than 7,000 residents in the Indianapolis Public Schools district are dissatisfied with the school system, according to surveys conducted in late summer by a coalition of community groups, including IPS itself.

Fifty-two percent of respondents gave IPS a score of 6 or lower on a 10-point scale, which the survey sponsors counted as being “dissatisfied stakeholders.” The remaining 48 percent of respondents were categorized as satisfied or enthusiastic about the school system.

The trouble for IPS is that there is a large gap between the number of people dissatisfied and those known as “loyal enthusiasts,” who gave the district scores of 9 or 10. This so-called “net promoter score”—used in many for-profit industries—registers at minus-24 for IPS.

Stand for Children, the group that helped coordinate the survey and the write-up of its results, cautioned against reading too much into the stakeholder satisfaction scores.

“On a number of occasions, stakeholders indicated their responses are dependent on which IPS school was being discussed, with strong support for some schools and little support for others,” wrote Stand for Children staff members in a report on the survey results, titled “What’s Possible?,” which was released Tuesday at noon.

The report also quantified overwhelming support for such things as effective teachers and principals; school-level decision making; school environments that are safe, positive and culturally responsive; expanded extracurricular programs; greater parental involvement; and more school-community partnerships.

The only category that received slightly less than 90-percent support was the idea of replacing underperforming schools with better options. That idea is central to an IPS overhaul proposed in December by The Mind Trust, an Indianapolis-based education reform group.

“The feedback gathered shows there is promising consensus on the need for key elements to improve the quality of education in our city,” said David Harris, CEO of The Mind Trust, in a prepared statement. He specifically cited support in the survey for greater access to preschool, school-level decision making; excellent teachers and school leaders; and strong neighborhood schools.

Also, the survey quizzed IPS residents on funding options for preschool for 4-year-olds. Nearly 80 percent support seeking state funding for preschool, but 65 percent also favor IPS shifting around funds to pay for preschool. Only 44 percent favored a local property tax increase to fund preschool.

“This report is extensive in detailing the community’s initial stated priorities for schools,” said Mayor Greg Ballard, in a prepared statement. “We want to be able to use it moving forward as we continue the discussion and work together on improving education in our community.”

The survey was supported by Ballard, IPS and seven other community groups: Greater Indianapolis NAACP, Indianapolis Urban League, La Plaza, The Mind Trust, Stand for Children, UNCF and United Way of Central Indiana.

The survey did reveal that lack of enthusiasm for IPS is fairly widespread in the district, which may be a factor contributing to continued declines in district enrollment and continued demand for the growing number of charter schools that are competing with IPS for students. The district has 30,100 students, down by 1,500 from the previous year.

In only two out of 17 ZIP codes that are part of the IPS district did “loyal enthusiasts” outnumber “dissatisfied stakeholders.” Among ethnic groups, only African Americans and Native Americans had more loyalists than dissatisfied stakeholders.

IPS Superintendent Eugene White dismissed the “net promoter score" for IPS because the survey included numerous people who have no connection at all with IPS, other than living within its district, he said.

He also noted that those who identified themselves as school parents or grandparents did not actually say they have children in IPS schools.

“It was ambiguous; it really didn’t mean anything. It was almost skewed to be negative,” White said. “I really think it was somewhat misleading, and I didn’t like that.”

White did say IPS is starting to do some satisfaction surveys internally for some of its programs. And he would welcome a similar survey given to all IPS parents or students.

“I’d like to have parents, people who have had students in the district in the last eight years, to respond,” White said. “I don’t want people reading the newspaper and going by that perception. There are many, many people who are very, very pleased at IPS.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I am an IPS parent and I was surveyed
    I was surveyed and I'm a very pleased IPS parent. Let me clarify. I'm pleased with what's happening at the school level, yet largely disturbed with what's happening at the central office. We have a fantastic principal and wonderfully committed teachers. We also have engaged parents who set high expectations for the school and for their children. Most of IPS is broken, but thankfully, my son is getting a world-class education for free--as it should be!
  • predictable result
    You could have predicted this survey result. I wonder what the result would be if you surveyed parents of IPS students?
    • Think Out of the Box: SELF DIRECTED LEARNING
      Challenging problems need out of the box solutions. Go to YouTube and search for "Slaman Khan: Let's use video to reinvent education". It is working in San Jose, fyi.
    • It's no surprise
      It's not surprising most people are dissatisfied with IPS. That's not news. The more important question is: what are IPS and other community leaders, the city and parents going to do about it? When will White and his overpaid cronies be held accountable for delivering better results? It can’t be soon enough. A great start toward positive change is to vote in new IPS board members next Tuesday — leaders who won’t be White’s puppets. We need a new breed of visionaries who will challenge the status quo, disregard mediocrity and demand real change. Though they may not have a student currently enrolled in IPS, residents that live within the school district’s boundaries, do have a lot at stake. Good schools attract new people to the area. Bad schools will chase them away--along with their money, support and commitment to the community.
    • Its the students
      problem is the students and the life they live, not the schools. when you have a bunch of ghetto losers who care about gangbanging and not getting an eduction this is what you get. the only schooling they care about is how to work the system for welfare. need to pull a Lean on Me and just kick out the crap and let those that want to learn learn. tired of this 'no child left behind' crap....it falls on the family. but like most in the ghetto community, they want to place blame on everything and everyone else except where the problems lie. and if they would look in the mirror they would see where the real problems are.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

    2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

    3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

    4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

    5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

    ADVERTISEMENT