IBJNews

Tapes show concern before Indiana stage collapse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A recording of dispatch radio calls shows that emergency workers were expressing concern about severe weather just minutes before winds ripped through the Indiana State Fair and caused a fatal stage collapse.

WTHR-TV in Indianapolis obtained recordings of Marion County dispatch communications from the night of Aug. 13, when thousands of fans were waiting to see a concert by country music group Sugarland. The stage rigging toppled into the grandstand, and seven people died.

In one excerpt, workers are warned about five minutes before the collapse that severe weather would be moving into the area in 30 minutes or less and are advised to "use your best judgment and find shelter when needed."

Two minutes later, another radio user asks if concert fans have been released from the grandstands. The response: "I have no information on that, I will check and advise."

Moments later, a 60-mph wind gust swept through the area, toppling the stage rigging into the grandstands. Four people were killed, and three people died later. More than 40 others were injured.

An emcee had announced over the loudspeakers that severe weather was possible and told fans where to seek shelter if an evacuation was necessary, though an evacuation wasn't ordered. Fair officials have said they were preparing to order an evacuation when the stage fell.

It wasn't immediately clear Thursday which agencies were using the county's radio system that night, though emergency medical service workers are referenced several times. Indiana State Police also are referenced, but a spokesman said state police weren't on the tapes.

WTHR obtained the tapes through a public records request. Marion County didn't respond Thursday to a request for the recordings from The Associated Press, and a message was left for the county's communications chief.

An attorney representing the estates of three people killed in the collapse said the tapes showed fair officials didn't take the severe weather seriously enough.

"The tapes confirm exactly what we've been saying from day one: This was no unforeseeable event. It was predictable and preventable," lawyer Kenneth J. Allen said.

Stephanie McFarland, a spokeswoman for the Indiana State Fair Commission, declined to comment on the tapes but noted a consultant had been hired to investigate how officials prepared and responded to the accident.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • dave
    Well Dave(from another Dave), your thinking is similar to my wife's. Personal responsibility. However I offer a different opinion. No, fans were not hostage but I bet many fans didn't know how bad the weather was about to get. The storm was not a surprise but being on ground level, in front of the stage, with the storm approaching from the North and West, fans really could not see it coming. AND the grandstand publc address mentioned that the show would go on and if the weather would get worse, they would evacuate. It never came.
  • Really
    Have the fans been released? Fans were not hostages and no one forced them to stay. i think the tape shows that they were looking at releasing fans, but the weather came in by surprise. One could argue it was predictable from earlier in the day when the news broadcasted the possibility of serve weather, so had the fans stayed home, no harm would have occurred!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. A non-compete clause is expected to keep Buchman from appearing on-air at WTHR for a year from the WISH contract’s expiration.

    2. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

    3. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

    4. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

    5. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

    ADVERTISEMENT