IBJNews

Texas investor wins over Steak n Shake shareholders, aims for chairmanship

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Texas investor Sardar Biglari rode a wave of shareholder anger to a landslide victory in his quest for Steak n Shake Co. board seats.

Now, the dissident 30-year-old investor who models his approach after Warren Buffett's is hoping to deliver on his promise to turn around the Indianapolis-based chain, with or without the chairmanship he covets.

Biglari has been making the case that investors deserve better since late 2007, mostly in a barrage of letters, a billboard or two and individual shareholder meetings. Steak n Shake has reported 10 consecutive quarters of declining same-store sales, and its shares have gone nowhere for 10 years. Biglari blames a management team that's "in the business of excuses, not restaurants."

The investor's track record shows big changes could be ahead for the chain, including another board shakeup, a shift to more franchised locations and ownership stakes for store managers. He wants to see tighter cost controls, improved service and more of an entrepreneurial mind-set. Biglari also has some more specific ideas: He wants the company's 500 restaurants in 19 states to add background music and remove harsh fluorescent lighting that makes guests feel uncomfortable.

Biglari and his adviser, Philip Cooley, 64, won more than 70 percent of the vote for the two seats they sought on the nine-member Steak n Shake board, ousting Chairman and acting CEO Alan Gilman and board member and former CEO James Williamson Jr.

The new board met for the first time March 12. After the meeting, the company appointed board member Wayne Kelley as interim chairman and CEO, apparently snubbing Biglari.

Steak n Shake had hinted in a statement that the seven returning board members would resist Biglari's push to become chairman. The specter of a divided board helped drive the company's share price even lower, to $7.91. The stock traded as high as $17.92 last August.

"We are encouraged by the shareholders' strong support for the existing board members, and also appreciate their desire to add additional perspective to the board as we move forward," Kelley said in a statement. The company declined to comment beyond the statement.

Adding accountability

Biglari and Cooley--nicknamed "Big and Cool" by message board supporters and "Breaklari and Fooley" by the opposition--did not win the most proxy votes, but the results nonetheless show a clear mandate. Each received more than 15 million votes, nearly triple the tally for Gilman and Williamson. In addition, shareholders withheld about 5 million votes for each of the returning board members--a group the dissident investors had not sought to unseat.

The proxy endorsement of Biglari was no surprise to Michael Gallo, an analyst who follows Steak n Shake for New York-based C.L. King & Associates Inc.

Gallo expects the new board will institute measures to contain costs, while continuing the search for a CEO to replace Peter Dunn, who stepped down in August. Gallo said a quick sale of the company--the strategy Biglari endorsed after investing in the Massachusetts-based ice cream chain Friendly's--is unlikely for Steak n Shake thanks to a small number of potential buyers and a challenging financing environment.

"For starters, they will try to drive some accountability, which has been lacking for several years," Gallo said. "Getting a new CEO in is really in our view the most critical thing at this juncture."

Restaurateur Steven Huse, a former president of Steak n Shake, said Biglari and Cooley are "aggressive and appear to be on the right track."

But to accomplish their goals, they'll need to remake the board with people who actually have restaurant experience, said Huse, who is no longer a shareholder.

"The average age of the board of directors is above the average age of their consumer, and they are financial- and education-oriented," Huse said. "They need to have representatives of casual upscale restaurant operators on their board."

Now they do. Biglari is chairman of the buffet chain Western Sizzlin, and Cooley is vice chairman. Biglari controls the San Antonio-based Lion Fund and Virginia-based Western Sizzlin Corp., a holding company for his investments.

All told, Biglari's companies own 8.5 percent of Steak n Shake. He began buying shares in March 2007 and launched his quest for board seats about five months later; most of his shares are worth about half what he paid. Biglari declined a request for an interview.

Way with words

Biglari sported an approachable gray suit and a purple tie when he met with shareholders at the downtown Marriott in early March.

It was the night before Steak n Shake's annual meeting, and he took questions for several hours, explaining how he planned to make money with shareholders, not off of them, as the company had charged.

The slight man, who bears a resemblance to the actor Adrian Brody, explained his vision for a restaurant with the service of Chili's and the price of McDonald's. He spoke calmly, with an occasionally cracking voice, and built to a plea for action. Steak n Shake's service is bad, restaurants are dirty, and management is ineffective, he argued.

"If we don't do something, Steak n Shake will become a footnote in the history of iconic American brands," he said.

Biglari's way with words also comes through in numerous letters to shareholders. His annual missives to investors in Western Sizzlin provide a peek inside his strategy and are modeled after his idol, the legendary investor Warren Buffett.

In the 2007 letter, he described how difficult it is to run a restaurant.

"The restaurant business is not an easy one to operate--actually it's brutal," he wrote. "It necessitates superior entrepreneurial talent that must fight unremittingly day in and day out and sometimes all day long to attract customers."

Biglari made his fortune by selling an Internet service provider he founded at the peak of the dot-com boom. He graduated from Trinity University, where he studied under Cooley.

He founded The Lion Fund in 2000, and has held himself to a high standard. In a 2003 letter to shareholders in the fund, he described the fund's annual performance as "dismal." It had returned 22 percent.

Biglari calls his investing strategy GULP, or "Growth at an Unreasonably Low Price."

"This maneuver leads me to be risk-averse, concentrated, and conservative with our capital," he told investing Web site The Motley Fool. "The right occasions for investment arise when there is general misunderstanding--and therefore mispricing--of the worth of an asset."

He sees Steak n Shake as a textbook example.

After the annual meeting, Biglari headed to a private meeting with the board, feeling confident he could change the company's course.

This time, he was dressed for the boardroom. Black suit, crisp white shirt, bright red tie.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT