IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: The critics are coming … the critics are coming

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

Why not Indy?

I asked myself that question during a session at last summer’s American Theatre Critics Association conference in Chicago. ATCA, made up of arts journalists from around the country, holds both a week-long and a weekend conference each year, loading up on plays wherever it goes. When I learned ATCA didn’t have a 2013 commitment yet for the latter, I was excited about the idea of bringing this learned, cranky, quirky, adventurous, honest, storied group of independent minds to Indy.

But there was an obstacle: Indy doesn’t have a reputation as a theater town.
 

ae-whippingman-15col.jpg The Indiana Repertory Theatre’s production of “The Whipping Man” will be among conference highlights. (Photo courtesy of Zach Rosing)

Smaller markets—including Minneapolis, Louisville and even Sarasota, Fla.—have built national reputations for their offerings, but Indy just hasn’t broken through, rarely attracting critics from even as close as Cincinnati or Chicago.

No, a reporter from Baltimore can’t sell many tickets in Indy, but the benefits of comment and criticism go beyond putting bodies in seats. Outside media opinion has the potential to put a place on the national radar, which helps attract talent, projects, development money and even more attention (FYI: Each year, ATCA makes a recommendation for the Regional Theater Tony Award). It’s also good to have fresh eyes on your work now and again.


ae-michael-feinstein---2008-photo-2-15col.jpg Conference attendees will also take in a concert with Michael Feinstein at the Palladium.

Before I opened my mouth at the conference, though, I opened up my laptop and searched for a weekend when it looked like the professional theater community in Indy had the best chance of shining brightest. A flurry of e-mails to arts groups indicated passionate buy-in and, within a few hours, I was standing up at an ATCA session pitching a weekend conference for Indianapolis.

At first, the stares seemed as blank as those of the audience at opening night of “Springtime for Hitler” in Mel Brooks’ movie “The Producers.”

But then I walked them through what the Indiana Repertory Theatre would be doing … and what the Phoenix Theatre would be doing … and what Michael Feinstein is doing with his Great American Songbook Archives at the Center for the Performing Arts.

The ATCA board bought it.ae-infobox
 But they warned me I might attract only about 20 members and guests and should keep it to a tight Friday-Sunday.

Eight months later, here we are. Under the auspices of IBJ A&E, ATCA is coming to Indy for a conference that not only attracted more than 40 attendees, but an alleged “weekend” conference where 30+ guests are arriving on Thursday, with some showing up as early as Monday and/or staying until the following Monday, all the better to absorb what the arts in Indy have to offer.

In addition to seeing “The Whipping Man” at IRT, “The Lyons” at the Phoenix, and a Michael Feinstein/Barbara Cook concert at the Palladium, we’ll see work from Beef & Boards, NoExit Performance, Acting Up Productions and Heartland Actors Repertory Theatre.

We’ll also see excerpts of

shows from Actors Theatre of Indiana and Dance Kaleidoscope, and get serenaded by talent in the Indiana History Center’s Cole Porter Room and at the Cabaret at the Columbia Club.

We’ll experience the art and hospitality of The Alexander hotel, the Conrad Indianapolis, and the Kurt Vonnegut Memorial Library. And we’ll try to squeeze in museum stops before, after, and in between.

There are also two open-to-the-public opportunities I’d like to share.

On March 22, at 1 p.m., the public is welcome to sit in on a free “Why the Midwest?” panel at the Indiana History Center, featuring actors and designers from the Indy theater community.

On March 24 from 10:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., Indy Fringe is hosting a Mini-Fringe, featuring two performances of hit shows, a panel discussion featuring Fringe directors from around the Midwest, and a Yats lunch, all for $25 (reserve at www.indyfringe.org).

But that won’t be your only chance to meet this critical mass of critics. You’ll see badge-wearers armed with pens and notebooks sitting next to you at the IRT, going back for seconds at the Beef & Boards buffet, pausing to check out the art at The Alexander, or exploring the Indiana History Center’s “You Are There” interactive attraction.

Don’t be afraid to say hello.

Most of them don’t bite.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Smaller market?
    Minneapolis is a smaller market than Indy? I beg to differ... According to the 2010 Census, metro MSP has 3.6MM residents and metro Indianapolis has 2.0MM residents. So not only is MSP not smaller, it is almost twice Indy's size... I know folks in Indianapolis like to think of Indy as a top 10 or 12 most populous "city" - which it is - but metro area, not just strict city borders, mean much more.
  • Bravo for Thinking Critically
    The sources of writing reflecting critical thinking about performances in arts and theater here in Indianapolis come primarily from weekly publications now or daily publications that provide writing about arts and theater once a week. What a boost to these local theaters that there might be so many additional sources of comment about the caliber of their productions than they can expect from limited local media. Thank you for taking the lead on this Lou and IBJ.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT