NCAA plans to battle counterfeiters during the men's Final Four

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

They aren’t as obvious as the stereotypical thug in trench coat and sunglasses who unloads stolen jewelry and wristwatches on unsuspecting tourists, but the NCAA considers them as unscrupulous.

They’re the legions of counterfeiters who travel to large sporting events in hopes of scoring on the lucrative market for sports apparel.

The NCAA will field a posse of police and hired hands to watch for unlicensed hats, T-shirts and other merchandise when Indianapolis hosts the men’s Final Four basketball championship here April 3-5.

“Recognizing it’s not murder or drug dealing, it’s paramount to what we do,” said Michael Drucker, a lawyer at Atlanta-based Collegiate Licensing Co. “It’s vital to be able to control your [trade]marks and the revenue they generate.”

The NCAA contracts with Collegiate Licensing to grant licenses to companies wanting to sell legitimate NCAA apparel and help enforce the licenses and collect royalties.

NCAACollege Licensing works with local law enforcement to patrol streets near the venue hosting the event, almost like they’d sniff out drug dealers.

For the Final Four, Drucker expects 20 employees to join a dozen Indianapolis police officers to put the squeeze on unlawful vendors skulking around Lucas Oil Stadium.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which manages the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center, estimates sales of legitimate products during the Final Four exceed $10 million, making the tournament an attractive target for counterfeiters.

In fact, Collegiate Licensing and police typically confiscate 500 to 2,500 counterfeit items at a Final Four tournament. The 2010 BCS National Championship football game between the University of Texas Longhorns and University of Alabama Crimson Tide resulted in an even larger bounty—about 3,800 pieces from 65 vendors, Drucker said.

The NCAA is preparing for the threat in Indianapolis like a coach for a big game.

“We do tend to see most of the [infringement] activity during the men’s basketball tournament, just because of the high exposure of the event,” said Jay Rossello, NCAA director of legal affairs.

Organized crime element

Indianapolis cops will begin searching for illegal transactions about a week before the Final Four games begin and conclude the day after the championship game, Drucker said.

Their full-court press will include hotels where the four teams stay and Indianapolis International Airport.

Penalties are weak. Anyone caught peddling counterfeits simply might be instructed to surrender their cache. Or they could be cited for trespassing or vending without a permit.

Those familiar with the seedier side of selling sports apparel realize it’s often not relegated to a few enterprising entrepreneurs looking to make a quick buck but, rather, to a much more serious threat—organized crime.

Counterfeiting is just as lucrative as the drug trade, without the attention and threat of steep prison sentences, said Karl Manders, owner of the Indianapolis-based Continental Enterprises Inc. intellectual property consulting firm.

“It’s one of those things that is a bigger problem than it seems to be,” Manders said. “It’s so lucrative; the profit is huge.”

Knockoffs are fairly simple to detect. All licensed merchandise sports a hologram label authenticating it as NCAA-approved. The logo of the manufacturer, such as Nike or Adidas, must be visible as well.

In contrast, bootleg items usually are laden with defects. Shoddy screen prints and substandard embroidery are the most obvious tip-offs. Other times—believe it or not—a word might be misspelled.

Counterfeiters often buy what’s known as “seconds” from distributors. These are plain T-shirts that have slight imperfections and cannot be sold to consumers in traditional retail outlets. The tags usually have been cut off, or are missing, to indicate their worthless value.

Most unlicensed vendors carry 10 to 15 T-shirts with them at a time. If their faulty merchandise fails to raise red flags, their sales methods should, Drucker said.

“Traditionally,” he said, “licensed merchandise is not sold by people running through parking lots with backpacks.”


Overall, it’s estimated that $200 billion to $250 billion of fake merchandise is sold in the United States annually.

The NCAA has about 50 trademarks and slogans protected, including Final Four, Elite Eight and Frozen Four, the men’s hockey championship.

Colleges and universities are responsible for protecting their own trademarks, and many also contract with Collegiate Licensing for those services. The company counts 165 colleges and universities as clients, including Purdue University and the University of Notre Dame, as well as several college conferences and the Heisman Trophy.

But if the Butler Bulldogs, for instance, were to advance to the Final Four, Collegiate Licensing could enforce any infringements to the logo, even though it doesn’t represent Butler, because the team is participating in an NCAA-sanctioned event.

A deep run in the tournament undoubtedly would bring more exposure to Butler, whose main threat of infringement comes from student groups oblivious to the legal ramifications, said Lindsay Martin, Butler’s manager of sports marketing and promotions.

“Schools that don’t have their trademarks protected don’t have a legal leg to stand on if something were to come up,” Martin said.

The bright spotlight shone on the Final Four arguably heightens the risk of trademark infringement to the NCAA and to participating teams. But the NCAA’s efforts to protect its rights extend beyond the tournament.

Infringement policies prevalent among all sports organizations are meant to protect authorized sponsors and advertisers who pay big money to be affiliated with a league, or a particular team.

Sponsorship agreements often range in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and can reach into the millions.

Any unlicensed company insinuating a partnership with the NCAA is first hit with a cease-and-desist letter, said the NCAA’s Rossello. Often, a letter persuades offenders to stop.

“It’s certainly important for us to make sure our partners receive the value they intended to get when they made the investment,” Rossello said. “The other part is that we don’t want to tarnish the NCAA.”

To be sure, lack of enforcement could jeopardize the NCAA brand, said Michael Swift, a lawyer at the local Maginot Moore & Beck LLP intellectual property boutique.

The hard part, however, is stopping infringement that occurs over the Internet, which can run rampant on Web sites such as eBay.

“That’s like a game of Whac-A-Mole,” Swift said. “Once you hit one, another pops up.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...