DINING: The nearness of Hue

Lou Harry
February 12, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

When the name was announced for the restaurant that would replace Taste of Tango downtown, the first thing that came to mind was an Abbott and Costello variant:

“So, where do you want to go to lunch?”


“No, I picked last time. Where do you want to go?”


“Seriously, I’d rather you pick.”

The new eatery, Hue Dine (36 E. Washington St., 634-4834) may not fall trippingly from the tongue. But a recent lunch visit made clear that this is a newcomer that Hue—I mean, you—should definitely check out.

Dining New Orleans Pork Loin tops a hearty navy bean ragout. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Our party stopped in during Devour Downtown, which offered a triple-course sample of many of the offerings (I’m including the standard menu prices for entrees here, however). For starters, all were impressed at the creativity and, more important, the taste of the salads. The Organic Mixed Greens offering accented the greens, cherry tomatoes and cucumbers with sweet poached red onions. A Spinach Salad included alfalfa, eggs, bean sprouts and a warm bacon vinaigrette. As newspaper people, our only complaint was the number of typos on the menu.

In the entree department, slices of Cajun-rubbed, slow-grilled pork topped a hearty navy bean ragout in the New Orleans Pork Loin ($13). The Loft 360 Bison Burger ($10) was juicier then most others of its ilk and came packed—but not smothered—in grilled onions and artichokes. Sided with steak fries cooked in duck fat (nice), it’s a keeper. Pan-Seared Halibut ($13) was evenly seared and looked great, but felt a bit skimpy for its price point. The Southwest Turkey Melt ($7), though, proved a deliciously toasted bargain, packed as it was with applewood bacon, avocado and chipotle aioli (and a side of perfectly crisp sweet-potato fries).

We don’t normally indulge in desserts at lunch, but given that this was part of Devour and included in the $15 price, we caved—and are glad we did. The Cranberry-Pomegranate Mousse lightly lured us into a sweet place where the two title ingredients whipped up nicely with a light dusting of sugar. The Chocolate Mint Silk, with chocolate shavings piled on top of moussy/minted goodness, was even better. A sampler of sorbets with hearty chunks of fruit was the perfect finale, leading me to believe Hue could become a good post-symphony stop, even if only for a drink and dessert.

In all—and at the risk of sounding like an empowerment poster from the ’80s—I’m glad there’s a Hue.•


Second in our month-long series of reviews of new restaurants downtown. 


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.