Homeownership losing cachet due to housing bust, job losses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Low interest rates, depressed home prices and new government incentives for buyers continue to make a compelling case for homeownership. But market observers doubt the beneficial conditions will be enough to maintain or grow the percentage of Americans who own a home, even in Indiana, where rates have consistently exceeded the national average.

That’s because a new generation of potential homebuyers are less eager, or able, to jump into a mortgage. Houses aren’t seen as can’t-miss investments anymore after so much equity disappeared, and financing is hard to come by for all but the most qualified of buyers.

Then there’s the issue of jobs. Unemployment hit a 26-year high of 10.2 percent in October. The most recent figure for Indiana stood at 9.6 percent.

Fresh college grads without a job are moving back in with their parents, and those who land an entry-level position are more likely to opt for the flexibility of renting a place for a few years.

“What’s permanent and long-lasting is the feeling you don’t have to buy a house as soon as you leave college,” said Steve LaMotte, senior vice president in the multi-housing group for CB Richard Ellis. “Watching friends or family or living through a foreclosure yourself, while certainly not as scary as someone who lived through the Depression, it causes people to rethink homeownership.”

Homeownership nationwide peaked at just above 69 percent in 2004 and has been steadily dropping since, to 67.6 percent as of Oct. 31, Census Bureau data shows. A University of Utah study predicts the national homeownership rate will continue to drop, to 63.5 percent by 2020, a level not seen since the mid-1980s.

In the Indianapolis area, homeownership peaked in 2006 at about 76 percent and has since fallen to 71.8 percent as of Oct. 31, Census data show.

Indiana has outpaced the U.S. homeownership rate for as long as the government has tracked it: The state has registered above 70 percent homeownership since the 1960s, largely because of an abundance of cheap, flat land on which to build affordable housing. And market observers expect Indiana to continue to clock in with higher homeownership rates than the national average.

Most folks around here who lost homes to foreclosure probably will be homeowners again, unlike in some frothy markets like California, said George Tikijian of locally based brokerage Tikijian Associates.

“They’ll only stay away for as long as their credit forces them to,” he said. “[Homeownership] is not the panacea it’s been promoted as, but I also think when people have the ability in the area they afford it, they are going to choose to own a home. I suspect the American dream will remain as hoped-for as ever.”

Nationwide, the under-35 age group has registered the steepest homeownership drop, falling to 39.8 percent at the end of October, down almost 8 percent from the same period in 2008.

As the job market improves, the apartment industry could benefit from lower homeownership rates. The under-35 crowd has long been a promising rental demographic, and the so-called “echo boomer”—or millennial—generation is larger in numbers than the baby boomers.

In the University of Utah study, Metropolitan Research Center Director Arthur C. Nelson predicts the number of rental-home units in the United States will grow 48 percent in the next 10 years, while owner-occupied homes will grow only 17 percent.

Apartment owners aren’t seeing progress yet: The national vacancy rate hit 7.8 percent in the third quarter, the highest quarterly posting in more than two decades. Part of the problem is a growing inventory of foreclosed homes and condos now offered for rent.

In Indianapolis, the vacancy rate stands at 10.7 percent, and Tikijian Associates predicts it will jump to 11.1 percent in 2010.

“It’s more driven by jobs than anything else,” Tikijian said. “If you don’t have a job, you can’t afford your own place.”

During the last five years, college grads considered part of the millennial generation bought houses quickly, seeing them as investments and feeling pressure that renting was fiscally unwise. Even if they have a job, more young folks are expected to wait longer before switching from an apartment to a house.

Apartment owners hoping to capitalize in the long run have more pressing concerns.

Moody’s estimates that apartment values have fallen as much as 40 percent from their highs in 2007, meaning many complexes that have loans coming due in the next few years may not get refinanced unless the owners invest new capital to make up for lost value.

Getting new projects financed is next to impossible, but that could have a bright side for existing owners: If demand catches up with supply, values could begin to stabilize, Tikijian said.

The United States would have to add 2.3 million new homeowners in the next six years just to maintain the current rate of homeownership, LaMotte said.

An $8,000 government incentive for first-time buyers has lured some buyers, but it probably won’t be enough to turn back a demographic shift. At the same time more young buyers are opting to rent, aging boomers are looking to downsize, often to apartments or retirement communities.

The government will continue to offer its own incentives to encourage homeownership. President Obama in November signed into law an extension of the $8,000 tax credit for first-time buyers and extended a new credit, of $6,500, to entice those who have owned their home for at least five years to move up to a new home.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.