IBJNews

Three Anderson workers fired over relatives' HUD funds

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Three employees of an Anderson department that receives federal money for affordable housing lost their jobs after they failed to notify city and federal officials that they had relatives living in homes paid for with the funds.

Interim economic development director Greg Winkler said the workers violated procedures by failing to inform the city's attorneys and federal officials that they had conflicts of interest.

Winkler told The Herald-Bulletin that the department receives more than $1 million in Housing and Urban Development funds each year. An investigation showed more than $600,000 of that money was used to house employee family members in HUD homes.

At least five cases have been found in which relatives were housed in HUD homes. Winkler said that could rise as the investigation continues.

Four of the violations stemmed from the HOME program, which allows people to lease a house from the city at a subsidized rate. Renters who want to buy the home within three years have half the money paid in rent applied toward a down payment.

At least one violation was tired to the Community Development Block Grant program, which uses funds to build homes for families.

Winkler said the Community Development Department is required to follow specific procedures to divulge any conflicts of interest, including seeking a review by the city's legal counsel and HUD authorities. Because those procedures weren't followed, the city had two options to resolve the conflict, he said.

"The people in those homes either have to move out of the homes, or the community development employees involved in this have to be removed," Winkler said. "It has to be one or the other. The feeling on the part of all parties involved is that it doesn't make sense to ask family members to move out of the homes.

"The last thing we want to do is in any way punish the folks that are receiving benefits. From our perspective, it's not their fault."

The city is not releasing the names of the fired employees.

Winkler said the city notified the Indianapolis HUD office of the violations and expects the Federal Housing Authority will conduct an audit. Anderson may have to repay some of the HUD money because of the violations, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

  2. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

  3. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

  4. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

  5. David Copperfield!

ADVERTISEMENT