IBJNews

Three Anderson workers fired over relatives' HUD funds

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Three employees of an Anderson department that receives federal money for affordable housing lost their jobs after they failed to notify city and federal officials that they had relatives living in homes paid for with the funds.

Interim economic development director Greg Winkler said the workers violated procedures by failing to inform the city's attorneys and federal officials that they had conflicts of interest.

Winkler told The Herald-Bulletin that the department receives more than $1 million in Housing and Urban Development funds each year. An investigation showed more than $600,000 of that money was used to house employee family members in HUD homes.

At least five cases have been found in which relatives were housed in HUD homes. Winkler said that could rise as the investigation continues.

Four of the violations stemmed from the HOME program, which allows people to lease a house from the city at a subsidized rate. Renters who want to buy the home within three years have half the money paid in rent applied toward a down payment.

At least one violation was tired to the Community Development Block Grant program, which uses funds to build homes for families.

Winkler said the Community Development Department is required to follow specific procedures to divulge any conflicts of interest, including seeking a review by the city's legal counsel and HUD authorities. Because those procedures weren't followed, the city had two options to resolve the conflict, he said.

"The people in those homes either have to move out of the homes, or the community development employees involved in this have to be removed," Winkler said. "It has to be one or the other. The feeling on the part of all parties involved is that it doesn't make sense to ask family members to move out of the homes.

"The last thing we want to do is in any way punish the folks that are receiving benefits. From our perspective, it's not their fault."

The city is not releasing the names of the fired employees.

Winkler said the city notified the Indianapolis HUD office of the violations and expects the Federal Housing Authority will conduct an audit. Anderson may have to repay some of the HUD money because of the violations, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT