IBJNews

Three WellPoint directors step down, cite personal reasons

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Three of WellPoint Inc.’s 11 board members have resigned, citing personal reasons for their decision to depart about six weeks after a new CEO took over at the second-largest U.S. health insurer.

Lenox Baker, Sheila Burke and Susan Bayh stepped down from the board effective immediately, Indianapolis-based WellPoint said Monday in a regulatory filing. “Each of the directors resigned for personal reasons and there were no disagreements or disputes between the company and any of the named directors which led to their resignation,” WellPoint said in the filing.

WellPoint ousted Angela Braly as CEO last August amid shareholder complaints about declining enrollment and the insurer’s disappointing stock performance. Joseph R. Swedish, a former hospital administrator, was hired to replace her and began March 25. The insurer last month reported first-quarter earnings that topped analysts’ estimates and on Monday affirmed its annual profit forecast of at least $7.75 a share, including investment losses of 5 cents a share.

“This is normal and it’s probably good for the company to clean out a few of the board members, especially given how long it took the board to come to the decision that it was time to remove the prior CEO,” said Erik Gordon, a business professor at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, in a telephone interview. “A new CEO always wants the full support of the board.”

Baker, a retired cardiac surgeon; Burke, a lecturer at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., and Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.; and Bayh, a lawyer and wife of former Democratic U.S. Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, had served on the board since December 2004, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

WellPoint “has benefited from their knowledge, leadership and many contributions,” the company said in a prepared statement. “Health care is transforming and that transformation is accelerating rapidly. It is incumbent on the board to bring in new perspectives to help navigate these changes.”

The insurer's stock rose less than 1 percent Monday to close at $76.01 per share. The shares have risen 25 percent so far this year.

Asked when new board members might be chosen, Kristin Binns, a WellPoint spokeswoman, didn’t give a timeline. “The board constantly evaluates qualified individuals,” she said in an e-mail. “They remain committed to this on-going process.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bye-Bye Bayh $
    So saddened to see Susan Bayh give up one of her many board seats. Leaving Wellpoint might cause a little tightening of the Bayh family budget for awhile. As we all know, Washington is a very expensive place to you live, and of course hubby Evan has never had a real job...

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT