IBJNews

Titanic buoys state museum attendance

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A last-minute addition to the exhibition schedule, "Titanic: The Artifact Exhibition," turned out to be a boon to the Indiana State Museum.

The museum reported Tuesday morning that the show, which closed on Sunday, attracted 88,465 paying visitors during its 103-day run and boosted overall museum attendance by 45 percent.

"Titanic is the biggest exhibit we've had," spokeswoman Kathi Moore said. "It really did bring the State Museum into the forefront for the first time in a very long time."

Titanic attendees paid $10 on top of the regular museum admission, which is $7 for adults without a membership.

The State Museum will not keep all ticket revenue from Titanic, though terms of the agreement with the Atlanta-based company that brought the show, Premier Exhibitions Inc., are confidential, Moore said. The main benefit of the blockbuster was the increase in overall museum attendance. Overall museum attendance was 135,666 during the period, compared with 74,087 a year ago.

The State Museum's last blockbuster was "The Lord of the Rings: The Exhibition" in 2005. Moore said. Titanic probably benefited from a longer run, which coincided with Thanksgiving and Christmas breaks.

The State Museum is not planning to host any outside traveling shows in the near future, though that can always change. Moore said. Premier Exhibitions offered Titanic because of a last-minute change in its schedule. Meanwhile, the museum is putting the finishing touches on "Amazing Maize: The Science, History and Culture of Corn," which the staff has been developing for the past two years. The show is slated to open in September and run for about 18 months.

The Indianapolis Museum of Art's fall exhibition, "Andy Warhol Enterprises," which ran through Jan. 2, exceeded projections of 40,000 attendees, spokeswoman Katie Zarich said. More than 47,000 people attended the show, though not all of them bought the $14 ticket. (Information on paid admissions was not available Tuesday morning.)

The IMA, where general admission is free, sold memberships to 1,902 households during Warhol because the special exhibit was free to members. The IMA has 8,139 member households.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Updated exhibits
    Artifacts are actually rotated in and out of displays approximately four times each year. We just wanted to take a moment to respond to the comments from Robb and Sue. Though our Core Galleries may appear the same each time you visit, we actually rotate artifacts in and out about four times a year. Sometimes there are small changes and sometimes they are bigger - but they do change. And our Treasures cases in the Great Hall are also changed out several times a year. Add that to our many temporary exhibits (you won't want to miss Art for the Nation opening on Jan. 29) and events and each visit is a different experience. We hope you will give us another chance!
  • Quality
    The Museum does not have the same exhibits it had 30 years ago... seeing as how it opened in its new location 9 years ago, and I was impressed with the updated exhibits then. However, since that time, I'll give you some leeway, Sue... some updates periodically would be nice. I'm not going to complain about the same items being displayed over the decades - history does have a habit of remaining pretty unchanging. Yet new viewpoints, new rediscoveries, and focused exhibits further detailing some pieces of the more general exhibits... those would be nice to see.
  • quality
    Unfortunately, attendance will fall back to where it was previously because the exhibits are boring, dusty and old. I don't think anything new has been added in years. It is the same stuff I saw when I attended as a child 30yrs ago!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

    2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

    3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

    4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

    5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

    ADVERTISEMENT