Tomisue Hilbert investigates mother's death, $15M insurance policy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Tomisue Hilbert, wife of Indianapolis businessman Steve Hilbert, is working with a team of attorneys to determine whether her deceased mother’s estate can claim the benefit of a $15 million life insurance policy issued by Houston-based American General Life Insurance Co.

On April 12, The Wall Street Journal published a story on its front page about the legal dispute over Germaine “Suzy” Tomlinson’s policy. IBJ broke the story about Tomlinson—Tomisue Hilbert’s mother—in January 2009. The civil lawsuit is set for a jury trial in October.

“The more we learn, the more concerns we have, and therefore we are continuing to investigate every angle of this situation,” Tomisue Hilbert said in a written statement.

In the legal quarrel, AIG is attempting to invalidate a $15 million policy it issued in January 2006 insuring the life of Tomlinson, who died Sept. 28, 2008, at the age of 74. AIG alleges the policy was part of a stranger-originated life insurance, or STOLI scheme.

In a STOLI scheme, outside investors effectively wager on when an insured person will die. In a typical transaction, an investor entices someone, usually a senior citizen, to take out a multimillion-dollar life insurance policy. Investors purchase the policy and pay the premiums, making themselves the beneficiaries. In return, the insured person receives an upfront cut of the eventual death payout.

Under the arrangement, the sooner the insured person dies, the better the return for investors.

“Imagine how difficult it is to learn of the sudden death of your mother, accompanied by very unusual circumstances,” Tomisue Hilbert wrote. “Germaine “Suzy” Tomlinson was a healthy, active and vibrant woman with a busy and fulfilling life. She was a loving mother and grandmother who was a daily part of our family.”

“When we were called to her home, we found broken glass, and she was fully clothed, face-down in her bathtub, drowned. After a brief investigation by the authorities, it seemed this was a tragic accident. Then months later we learn there was a $15 million insurance policy on her life payable to someone other than a family member.”

The initial defendants in the Tomlinson case were J.B. Carlson, owner of the locally based Carlson Media Group; Nevada insurance broker Geoffrey A. Vanderpal; and Delaware-based Wilmington Trust Co.

Carlson said Tomlinson served as vice chairwoman and a director of his company, which paid annual premiums of $387,274.85 on the policy. As trustee, Carlson said he’s entitled to the $15 million.

In court documents, Carlson has alleged Tomlinson began attending Carlson Media Group board meetings in November 2002, making the $15 million policy “Key Man” insurance. The WSJ reported that Carlson was the last person to see Tomlinson alive.

“This insurance is supposedly based on my mother’s position with a company we haven’t really been able to learn much about,” Tomisue Hilbert wrote. “Ironically, one of the persons involved was the last person with my mother that fateful evening. There were loans against the policy that were due within days of my mother’s death.”

IBJ originally alerted Hilbert and the Indiana Department of Insurance about AIG’s lawsuit in January 2009. Hilbert, who wasn’t previously aware of the suit, initially feared foul play, but the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department ruled the death an accidental bathtub drowning. The Marion County Coroner’s Office listed Tomlinson’s cause of death as asphyxia by drowning with acute ethanol intoxication as a contributing cause.

Tomisue Hilbert last summer became an intervenor defendant in the insurance tussle, arguing that AIG should not invalidate the $15 million policy. Instead, Tomisue Hilbert argues its proceeds should go to Tomlinson’s five adult children.

“My mother always wanted to take care of her family and frequently talked to me about how she had taken care of things for her children and grandchildren,” Tomisue Hilbert wrote.

“The insurance application shows my mother intended to benefit her family,” Hilbert continued. “My mother was not a sophisticated businessperson, and this situation shows the danger of allowing large insurance policies to be written on the lives of elderly people who may not fully understand what is going on.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?