IBJNews

Tornadoes latest catastrophe to hit insurer's books

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Baldwin & Lyons Inc. expects to lose another $10 million due to worldwide catastrophes that occurred in the first half of the year, the Indianapolis-based property and casualty insurer reported Tuesday.

The tornadoes that hit Tuscaloosa, Ala., and Joplin, Mo., are the latest events that caused damage to the auto and trucking fleets Baldwin & Lyons insures. The company estimates the tornadoes will yield $6.5 million in losses, even after tax considerations, during the second quarter, which ends June 30.

On top of that, Baldwin & Lyons said it will record another $3.6 million in second-quarter losses caused by a February earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand, and the March earthquake in Sendai, Japan, which caused a nuclear scare.

The earthquakes, along with flooding in Australia, already cost Baldwin $14.2 million during the first quarter, leading the company to a $15.2 million quarterly loss, or $1.02 per share.

During the first quarter the year before, Baldwin & Lyons made a profit of $545,000.

The estimated losses in 2011 already put Baldwin & Lyons ahead of a record-setting 2010, in which the company paid out $24 million, after taxes, to repair damage caused by an earthquake in Chile and windstorms in Australia and Europe.

In a statement, Baldwin cautioned that its catastrophic loss estimates are based on its discussions with its reinsurance companies and client brokers, and rely heavily on modeling. The actual losses could turn out to be different from the estimates.

Baldwin & Lyons will report its second quarter financial results on Aug. 4.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • TORNADO DAMAGE
    While Baldwin & Lyons is in business to cover damage caused by tornados, there was widespread catastrophic damage in this case, enough to strain any insurer.
  • And...?
    Isn't this what the business of insurance is supposed to be about? Loss? This article is written to make this sound like an awful catastrophe for the company, when reality is that this is what they are in the business of covering. If they are investing their capital correctly and are managing their books correctly, they should have PLENTY of money to cover their CLIENT'S losses, especially considering how much they charge for premiums over the long haul. If they are losing that much, it more likely means that there are too many fat cats raking it in at the top (as usual) that could be cut easily which could help repair things a bit. I have no sympathy for insurance companies whatsoever when they whine about losses.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT