IBJNews

Tornadoes latest catastrophe to hit insurer's books

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Baldwin & Lyons Inc. expects to lose another $10 million due to worldwide catastrophes that occurred in the first half of the year, the Indianapolis-based property and casualty insurer reported Tuesday.

The tornadoes that hit Tuscaloosa, Ala., and Joplin, Mo., are the latest events that caused damage to the auto and trucking fleets Baldwin & Lyons insures. The company estimates the tornadoes will yield $6.5 million in losses, even after tax considerations, during the second quarter, which ends June 30.

On top of that, Baldwin & Lyons said it will record another $3.6 million in second-quarter losses caused by a February earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand, and the March earthquake in Sendai, Japan, which caused a nuclear scare.

The earthquakes, along with flooding in Australia, already cost Baldwin $14.2 million during the first quarter, leading the company to a $15.2 million quarterly loss, or $1.02 per share.

During the first quarter the year before, Baldwin & Lyons made a profit of $545,000.

The estimated losses in 2011 already put Baldwin & Lyons ahead of a record-setting 2010, in which the company paid out $24 million, after taxes, to repair damage caused by an earthquake in Chile and windstorms in Australia and Europe.

In a statement, Baldwin cautioned that its catastrophic loss estimates are based on its discussions with its reinsurance companies and client brokers, and rely heavily on modeling. The actual losses could turn out to be different from the estimates.

Baldwin & Lyons will report its second quarter financial results on Aug. 4.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • TORNADO DAMAGE
    While Baldwin & Lyons is in business to cover damage caused by tornados, there was widespread catastrophic damage in this case, enough to strain any insurer.
  • And...?
    Isn't this what the business of insurance is supposed to be about? Loss? This article is written to make this sound like an awful catastrophe for the company, when reality is that this is what they are in the business of covering. If they are investing their capital correctly and are managing their books correctly, they should have PLENTY of money to cover their CLIENT'S losses, especially considering how much they charge for premiums over the long haul. If they are losing that much, it more likely means that there are too many fat cats raking it in at the top (as usual) that could be cut easily which could help repair things a bit. I have no sympathy for insurance companies whatsoever when they whine about losses.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT