IBJNews

Towing companies sue city over contracts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two local towing companies are suing the city of Indianapolis for awarding contracts to competing services that they claim didn’t meet bid requirements.

Wheeler’s Towing Service Inc. and Indy Towing Service Inc. filed the lawsuit Tuesday in Marion Superior Court.

The contracts, awarded in late May, were for towing services in six city districts. Both Wheeler’s and Indy Towing say they lost two districts to a company that promised to pay the city more than the bid requirement and another district to a company accused of predatory towing.

A request for proposals capped the towing fee at $90 for police-ordered tows that might involve abandoned or impounded vehicles. The city, which receives a portion of the towing fee, typically awards bids to towing companies willing to pay the city the biggest share, according to the complaint.

The city advised bidders that “the minimum acceptable ... franchise fee is $45, however, bidders are strongly encouraged to bid higher,” the suit said.

In exchange for a winning bid, towing companies receive exclusive rights to private tows initiated by the city. Private tows are not subject to franchise fees, and the volume typically exceeds police-ordered tows, so towing companies can afford to pay higher franchise fees for police-ordered tows.

Wheeler’s bid was $89.76—or 24 cents lower than the $90 towing fee set by the city on police-ordered tows.

But localled based Zore’s Inc. agreed to pay $100.01 per tow, meaning the company would lose $10.01 on every police-ordered tow, the complaint alleged.

Of the eight companies that responded to the invitation to bid, only Zore’s bid more than the $90 towing fee, the suit said.

“In essence, Zore’s agreed to give the city a kickback of $10.01 over and above the towing fee that can be charged to the public pursuant to the [invitation to bid],” wrote Linda Pence, the attorney for Wheeler’s and Indy Towing.

But the city argues that the Zore’s bid is acceptable because the $90 limit only applies to what can be charged to the public and does not include the city franchise fee, as the plaintiffs charge.

“This bid process is nothing more than an attempt by the city to get the best possible deal for taxpayers,” said Marc Lotter, the city’s communications director.
 
In another district, Indy Towing’s bid of $80 was beat by Interstate Towing’s bid of $82.56. Indy Towing charges that the city awarded a contract to a “non-responsible bidder” because Interstate Towing has allegedly been involved in “predatory” towing practices.

A pending city proposal cracking down on “predatory” towing comes on the heels of numerous complaints from people who say they've been taken advantage of by opportunistic towtruck operators.

By law, Lotter said the city must accept the highest bid, which led it to choose Interstate Towing.

The contracts take effect July 1. Wheeler’s and Indy Towing are asking for an injunction to delay their execution.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What a switch!

    In almost any portion of the state, we see, "maximum fine $X", which means $1 would be possible. Other states; e.g., Illinois, have minimum fines. Hit a road worker, $14k, 2 years in prison.

    Which is scarier? Min or Max?

    Min Fine $500 for litter?
    You could find yourself paying $1k, $2k, etc. The only thing would be if you feel it's unfair and challenge your particular fine. But not for anyone else, they'd still pay higher fees.
  • Nonsense and sour grapes
    And if ANY towing service should be restricted from doing business, it's Indy Towing - who "recovered" my stolen Jeep Cherokee, and in the process managed to destroy half the undercarriage, bend the rotors, puncture the gas tank, and demolish the exhaust system. Even to the point of dragging the Jeep off the flatbed, when the key was offered so the drive train could be disengaged! Fortunately, the transmission and transfer case weren't damaged, which they could have all too easily. I took photos of the Jeep as it sat in their yard, and again after they "delivered" it. The before and after damage is clear. And they wouldn't allow us to put tires and a battery on the car so we could just drive it out. Nuts! I de-recommend Indy Towing to anyone and everyone I can corner.
  • More of the Same
    All this administration has done is steer contracts to companies represented by particular attorneys or lobbyists. We all thought we were getting a different type of politician in Greg Ballard. It's true we did. We got someone who has taken pay to play politics to an unprecedented level in Indianapolis. Why doesn't Ballard care about taxpayers?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT