IBJNews

Track, tennis venue at IUPUI eyed for demolition

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Long-range plans for IUPUI unveiled this month call for the demolition of the Michael A. Carroll Track & Field Stadium and Indianapolis Tennis Center, raising questions about the future of sporting events held at those venues that have generated tens of millions of dollars in economic activity for the city.

Plans also call for the preservation of the natatorium, which needs repairs after hosting numerous world-class swimming events since it was built in 1982, and the construction of a 6,000-seat convocation center and basketball arena.

IUPUI's recently unveiled 20-year master plan calls for the track stadium to give way initially to green space that will help connect the campus to prime real estate along White River. Later phases call for mixed-use development, perhaps including a grocery store and other retail outlets along with condos and other housing units with views overlooking the Indianapolis Zoo, White River and downtown.

IUPUI officials said they haven't pinpointed dates for specific changes, but they said significant campus modifications could start within a few years.

There's a possibility the track — with an artificial turf in the infield — could remain as an amenity for the residential development, IUPUI officials said. But the stadium itself will almost certainly be demolished or dramatically downsized.

The track, which was built in 1982 along with the natatorium as part of a movement to make Indianapolis the "Amateur Sports Capital of the World," has been host to national championships, Olympic Trials and other world-class events. Several world records have been set there by such athletes as Carl Lewis and Florence Griffith Joyner.

"It's difficult to get past the emotional part of this," said Indiana Sports Corp. President Susan Williams. "The history there is just so rich."

But in the end, the broad swath of real estate along New York Street the track and adjacent softball fields sit on is simply too valuable for a facility with such limited use, IUPUI officials said. IUPUI doesn't even have a track team, or any plans to start one.

On the eastern edge of campus, the tennis center — including the stadium court and indoor and outdoor courts — would be demolished to make room for a performing arts center and another building that would house a 6,000-seat convocation center and basketball arena.

IUPUI Chancellor Charles Bantz and his top lieutenants will meet in early January with JJR, the planning division of Detroit-based architecture firm SmithGroup that was hired to draft the master plan. At that meeting they'll further discuss and formalize the plan in anticipation of presenting it to the school's trustees in February.

"We've encouraged people to give us input," Bantz said. "We want this to be an open process."

The university held public meetings on the plan Dec. 11 and 12, and Bantz said about 300 people attended.

"We've gotten a largely positive response," he said.

Local tennis and track and field officials are still grappling with the ramifications of the announcements.

Indianapolis Tennis Championships Director Kevin Martin promised the tournament would continue despite the university's plans.

"We're still digesting the intentions and the timing of the intentions," Martin said. "We've been exploring other options ... in the event we don't have the right opportunities at some point at IUPUI."

One thing is certain, Martin said. The Indianapolis Tennis Championships will be held at the facility on the IUPUI campus in 2009. Beyond that, neither school nor tournament officials would say where the tournament will be held.

Tourism experts estimated the local ATP tournament formerly known as the RCA Championships has an annual economic impact of about $9 million.

"This goes way beyond tennis," said Mark Saunders, executive director of the U.S. Tennis Association's Midwest Section, which is headquartered in Indianapolis. "There's a lot of economic impact to these facilities that affect the entire downtown and broader community. This plan is disconcerting to me."

Losing the tennis center could present challenges beyond finding a new venue for the tournament. The USTA and other tennis groups use the indoor and outdoor courts for training camps, youth development clinics and various lesser-known tournaments.

"If that facility goes away, and the city or some other entity doesn't step forward to build another tennis stadium, a lot of economic impact is going to vanish from this city forever," Saunders said.

The plan calls for building the convocation center/basketball arena where many of the outdoor courts are now. The demolition of the four indoor courts plus some of the more easterly outdoor courts would make room for green space, and the stadium court would be demolished to make room for a performing arts center.

Bantz said the university simply has no use for the tennis facility. In addition, university officials said, it needs $8 million to $12 million in repairs and upgrades just to remain viable for the ATP tournament.

"We've been pretty straightforward with the tennis folks," Bantz said. "That's why we're on a year-to-year lease. We just can't invest in that facility. We all knew the tennis center was not going to be there in 20 years unless someone puts a lot of money into it. Our students never use it."

While local tennis officials seemed to have some advance notice of the plans, officials for locally based USA Track & Field were caught more off guard.

"I was surprised and am still awaiting official notification," said USATF CEO Doug Logan. "I was really disappointed we weren't notified or consulted in some way by the university. We have a limited number of venues we can hold our events in, and the track and field stadium at IUPUI is one of the best."

Logan said the stadium is still actively used for dozens of community events each year, and for world-class events. Carroll Stadium hosted the 2006 and 2007 U.S. National Championships, which combined had a $10 million economic impact according to the Indianapolis Convention and Visitors Association.

ISC's Williams said no one from her organization was consulted on the plans.

"It's a surprise because the track and field stadium in particular was one of the pillars that the sports movement in this town was built on," she said.

There has been IUPUI-owned land identified along Indiana Avenue, north of Fall Creek, for the possible construction of outdoor tennis courts and softball diamonds, but if the track stadium goes away, there are no plans to constuct a new one on campus.

"From a sports perspective, the loss of this track with no viable replacement is a great loss," said Greg Harger, coach and director of the Indiana Invaders, a local track club composed of Olympians and Olympic hopefuls. "This city is known as the home of one of the five best tracks in the country. I hope this loss isn't the beginning of the end of this city's reputation as a sports capital."
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT