IBJNews

Truck stocks signal economic growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Companies that act as brokers for trucking services are gaining favor with investors as the 20-month-old rebound shifts into a new phase that’s less dependent on inventory restocking.

The so-called asset-lite truckers such as Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. lease vehicles for businesses that need to ship goods, so they have more cost flexibility than companies that own and operate most of their trucks. Shares of these brokers have risen 6.9 percent since July 30, 2010, compared with a 1.5 percent decline for operators including Indianapolis-based Celadon Group Inc., according to two new Bloomberg indexes.

“We are way past the early cycle rally,” and now see “sustainable elements to the recovery,” said Benjamin Hartford, transportation analyst at Milwaukee-based Robert W. Baird & Co., who co-wrote Baird’s 2011 freight-outlook report. As the rebound matures, investors will find “greater resiliency” in companies with flexible costs.

Trucking demand varies with the economy, accounting for 71 percent of the value of U.S. goods shipped in 2007, according to the most recent data from the Department of Transportation.

The Baird report shows the recovery spanning 26 months so far, based on the Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing index, which hit a recession low in December 2008. That’s more than halfway through an average of 40 months, which the current expansion may exceed, Hartford said. The recession that ended in June 2009 was the longest since the 43-month slump during the Great Depression, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research.

The U.S. economy likely will expand at a 3.2 percent rate this year, according to the median estimate of 63 economists surveyed in February by Bloomberg News, with exports and business spending on equipment and software poised to generate most of the growth, said Joseph Carson, director of economic research at AllianceBernstein LP in New York.

When the rebound began in the third quarter of 2009, growth was driven by government spending, along with companies that were building stockpiles and needed truckers to move their products. This made the operators more appealing to investors because their profits rise more quickly in this stage of recovery.

“I tend to favor the asset-based guys” early in the cycle, because they “are able to get rate increases as well as higher volumes,” said Kevin Sterling, an analyst at BB&T Capital Markets in Richmond, Va.

Celadon’s stock more than tripled to $14.79 at the end of last year from $4.47 on March 9, 2009, as the operator reported net income of $2.86 million in the quarter ended Dec. 31, compared with a loss of $2.08 million in the January-March 2009 period.

Freight volumes peaked in September and have dropped 10 percent since then, as measured by the Cass Freight Shipments Index. Momentum for Celadon stock has slowed as well; it has fallen 2.6 percent since the end of December.

The Bloomberg U.S. Truckload Trucking Index tracks the performance of Celadon, Werner and seven other operators. The Bloomberg U.S. Non-Asset Based Trucking Index tracks Roadrunner, C.H. Robinson and six other brokers. The two indexes show that shares of the operators rose 25 percent between May 30, 2008, and July 31, 2010, compared with a 16 percent decline for the brokers.

The asset-heavy companies also outperformed in 2001 and 2002, coming out of the recession that ended in November 2001. As the recovery matured, the asset-lite truckers outperformed from 2003 to early 2008.

When freight volumes started to cool off in 2007, Roadrunner responded quickly to protect profits, adopting cuts that slashed its vehicle-leasing costs by 17 percent over two years.

“The advantage we have is we don’t run empty miles,” said Peter Armbruster, chief financial officer of the Cudahy, Wis., company. If customers “go from needing to do eight trips instead of 10 between our Milwaukee terminal and southern California, we just do eight. It is more efficient.”

Inventory building aided economic growth for five consecutive quarters through the third period of 2010, when it contributed 1.61 percent to the 2.6 percent gain. When companies stopped adding to their stockpiles in the fourth quarter, the reduction subtracted 3.7 percent from growth, the most since the first quarter of 1988.

John Wiehoff, chief executive officer for Eden Prairie, Minn.-based C.H. Robinson, said the broker’s lower-cost model allows it to adjust expenditures rapidly in response to demand.

“We’re very proud that we were able to manage through the recession with an earnings increase in each of the past two years,” he said on a Feb. 1 conference call with investors. “We think that’s a pretty visible statement about our business model.”

Brokers like C.H. Robinson “have higher returns, very little debt and a lot of cash on the balance sheet,” along with “more financial flexibility” and fewer capital-expenditure requirements, according to Sterling, who said BB&T Capital Markets is recommending investors purchase the Minnesota company and Roadrunner.

C.H. Robinson announced in December a 16 percent increase in its cash dividend to 29 cents a share. It had $398.6 million in cash at year-end, compared with $11.1 million for Celadon.

“The asset-lite guys can act countercyclically,” said Peter Nesvold, managing director and senior equity research analyst in New York at Jefferies & Co. “As fundamentals start to improve, we have a long way we can ride.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT