Two wins to bring Lilly modest sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Finally, some new revenue. Eli Lilly and Co. will enjoy modest new sales later this year after U.S. regulators approved a new diabetes drug developed by a partner company, and another firm nears approval on a drug that will produce royalties for the Indianapolis-based drugmaker.

The Type 2 diabetes drug, Tradjenta, approved May 2 by the Food and Drug Administration, is expected to ramp up to worldwide sales of $600 million by 2015, according to an estimate by Citi analyst John Boris.

The approval marks the fourth new drug approval won by Lilly in the past two years, following a nearly five-year dry spell. The other new drugs—which include the blood-thinner Effient, the statin Livalo and the testosterone booster Axiron—all have paltry sales so far.

Lilly would pocket only about $247 million of Tradjenta's annual sales, according to Boris, with the rest going to Germany-based Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, which developed the drug. Tradjenta sales will be dampened by two similar drugs already on the market, Merck & Co. Inc.’s Januvia and Onglyza, made by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and AstraZeneca plc.

Lilly and Boehringer signed a co-development deal in January involving four diabetes drugs, with an option for a fifth. Tradjenta, chemically known as linagliptin, will be the first of those to hit the market.

"Our alliance with Boehringer Ingelheim represents one of the most robust diabetes pipelines in the pharmaceutical industry," said Enrique Conterno, president of Lilly Diabetes. "Tradjenta is the first regulatory approval of what we hope will be many new treatment options this alliance brings to the millions of Americans living with type 2 diabetes."

Lilly could see roughly the same amount of revenue by 2015 in royalties from telaprevir, a hepatitis C drug that appears primed for FDA approval on May 23, according to Wall Street analysts. The drug, developed by Massachusetts-based Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc., won a unanimous recommendation from an FDA advisory panel on April 29.

Lilly helped identify and develop telaprevir in a collaboration with Vertex that began in 1997. But in December 2002, Lilly sold back most of its rights to the drug after reprioritizing its research portfolio.

Analysts estimate Lilly still has a claim to royalties on the drug’s sales, somewhere in the range of 3 percent to 9 percent. Neither Lilly nor Vertex has disclosed the exact terms.

But with analysts expecting telaprevir to be a blockbuster, Lilly (which must be kicking itself for letting the drug go) could still pocket some meaningful change. Bert Hazlett expects sales of $2.5 billion a year, meaning Lilly could pull in as much as $225 million per year.

Boris, the Citi analyst, thinks telaprevir could produce sales in 2015 of $4.8 billion. He expects Lilly to get no more than 5 percent in royalties, but that would still be nearly $240 million per year. And those royalties would be pure profit for Lilly.

The influx of dollars from Tradjenta and telaprevir, while less than $500 million combined, would still help Lilly offset the massive loss of revenue it faces from drugs whose patents are expiring, allowing patients to switch to cheaper generic copies.

In November, Lilly started facing generic competition for its $1 billion-a-year cancer drug Gemzar. Six months from now, its bestseller Zyprexa, a $5 billion-a-year antipsychotic, will face generics in the United States and Europe.

The patent on Cymbalta, a $3.5 billion-a-year antidepressant, expires in mid-2013. And the billion-dollar-drug Evista loses patent protection in 2014.


  • Not yet a revival of Lilly research
    Tradjenta is a success that is worth celebrating, but it is really Boehringer-Ingelheim's success, not Lilly's. The drug is a product of B-I's research, and B-I is the only company mentioned in the FDA's approval letter. Lilly deserves praise for its alliance with B-I, but we will have to wait a little longer for signs that Lilly research can deliver on its own.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............