U.S. 31 project leaves many living in uncertainty

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Jeffrey Dierbeck said he wasn't allowed to watch his childhood home on Kern Road in South Bend be torn down to make way for the new U.S. 31 highway.

"My family has owned this property for four generations," he said. "I still have a hard time going back there and looking at that property."

The stumps of the oaks and cherry trees were ground up, and the trees, along with the remnants of Dierbeck's house, were sent off to be sold to a buyer.

"My wife and I were inside the house as they took down the trees," Dierbeck told the South Bend Tribune. "One of the workers knocked at our door and told us they were going to start cutting."

Dierbeck tried to fight the acquisition of his property but was recently relocated to an area that he said does not match what he lost.

"We are not satisfied with the settlement at all," he said. "They took my barn, and I had a contractor come out and give me an appraisal of $160,000 to replace and rebuild it, and the state came in and gave $17,000 for it."

According to public records on the project's Web site, US31plysb.com, about 131 residential homes will be acquired by the end of the project.

"It all depends on where people are located," said Indiana Department of Transportation media relations director Matt Deitchley. "We're doing our best to work with those in the area and find the best possible solution."

The northern part of the project is on schedule and much of the route has already been finished to reduce driving time and accidents between South Bend and Indianapolis.

"The reason we are pushing this project is because it is going to be safer," Deitchley said. "It will be taking 30 minutes off the drive toward Indianapolis, but its main importance is it allows for a straighter drive with less stops."

But some residents are worried about the increase in noise and traffic on the road.

Scott Hickman lives on Kern Road, which, according to the records on INDOT's site, will be widened to a five-lane road to accommodate the interchange.

"The whole landscape has changed and is changing," Hickman said. "I've lived here since 1986 and the road is nice and quiet, and now I don't know what is going to happen."

Deitchley said this is a necessity to help the flow of traffic once the route is complete.

"Our studies show the new Kern Road interchange off of the new U.S. 31 will handle about 10,000 more vehicles a day by 2030, compared to what it handles in 2012," Deitchley said.

"INDOT combines many factors into deciding the route of any project. U.S. 31 was no different," Deitchley said. "Ultimately, we decide upon a route that will have the least impact both environmentally and on property owners, while still remaining responsible with taxpayer dollars."

Some business owners say they have also not received a notice of how the road will affect their locations.

"We have not been contacted by INDOT since Christmas," said Graffis Furniture owner Tom Van Der Heyden. "The survey people came through and took photos, then shortly after that they staked the property."

Graffis has been open for almost 60 years and is now closing its doors to make way for the possibility of its property being acquired.

"The property owner has been reached and the paperwork was forwarded to him, but I have not been contacted about my business," Van Der Heyden said.

On average, those relocated have had 30 days to move out of their property, which, in the case of a furniture store, is difficult to accomplish, he said.

"The only frustration I have right now is not knowing the time frame," Van Der Heyden said. "We finally decided to be proactive about it because we knew we'd only have 30 days to be out."

Van Der Heyden is leasing the building for the business, but said as the business owner he should be receiving a proposal as well.

"Once the property owner and I sign off on the proposal, things can be put into motion," he said.

Dierbeck said that, for individual homeowners, he found negotiating on his own was the best option, but even then, he'll never be able to replace what he has lost.

"The state wasn't able to find me anything that was comparable to what I had," Dierbeck said. "The home I had been offered was vacant for quite a while, the barn on the property was dilapidated and the water that came out of the well was rusty. I lost rolling hills, all my trees and a large part of my family's history, and that's all it was worth."


  • wrong assumption
    Roads do not need to be built. If you did even a modest inventory, you would see that we have an oversupply of capacity and our regional VMT is actually down per capita. The issue is location and subsidy. As people push futher away from jobs and services, the state and municipalities trigger a response of plowing down land and allocating sickening amounts of dollars and resources. The world doesn't have hungry people because of a lack of food.............We don't have transportation issues because of a lack of roads. By the way, when was the last time you saw a road pay taxes or generate positive revenue flow?
  • People need to realize development is good
    People are so closed-minded here! Get over it, roads need to be built, it is called development. If it were my house- yes, I would be upset, but I would quickly realize that roads need to be built and our metro is growing.
  • Roads
    In the words of Mr. Spock: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few."
  • Highway supporter
    Yep. Build more roads!
  • Long Range Plan?
    When does this stop? When is a road wide enough? Do you supporters of highways see where this leads? What if it was your home? Would you still support this as "economic Development"? Would you still support this as "progress and growth"?

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

    2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

    3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

    4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

    5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.