IBJNews

Local United Way aims for pre-recession giving

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

United Way of Central Indiana kicked off its fundraising season Friday with a record goal of $39.2 million.

Reaching that target would mean surpassing the pre-recession fundraising amount of just under $39.1 million in 2007, the organization said.

The goal also represents nearly $1 million more than was raised last year.

Last year, United Way set a much more ambitious goal of $41 million but fell short, bringing in $38.3 million.

The chair of this year's campaign is local artist and philanthropist Marianne Glick, who is encouraging people to "dream big and give gleefully."

Glick is sponsoring an online video contest and United Way's new coupon-rewards program, the Caring Club. People who give at least $150 will be eligible for member discounts at national and local businesses.

United Way was scheduled to kick off its campaign at noon Friday with an Indianapolis Colts pep rally on Monument Circle. The Colts are sponsoring the campaign for a second time.

Anyone who makes a new gift of $150 or increases past giving by that amount will be eligible for a drawing with Super Bowl tickets as the grand prize. Other prizes include Colts tickets, game-worn jerseys and autographed footballs. 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • WOW
    LTWIG These numbers are staggering, their administrative costs seem to be excessive
    for a non-profit charity
  • consuming
    Indiana United Way 2008
    pres/ceo: $213,955
    three officers $130,000
    three officers $90,00
    Ind. United Way also oversees Ind. Children's Bureau
    pres/ceo $178,000
    excec vp $114,000
    excec vp $109,000
    excec vp $104,000
    excec vp $103,000

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT