IBJNews

UPDATE: BrightPoint sale follows tough stretch for firm

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

BrightPoint Inc.'s decision to sell to a California company for $840 million followed a tumultuous five months for the Indianapolis cell phone distributor during which its stock price fell by more than half.

Analysts said BrightPoint's sale to Santa Ana-based Ingram Micro Inc. makes sense in light of the soft cell phone market and the company's recent struggles.

Ingram Micro, the world's largest technology distributor, agreed to pay $650 million in cash and assume $190 million in BrightPoint debt. The per-share price—$9—is a 66-percent premium to BrightPoint's closing price on Friday. But it's well below the stock's 52-week high of $12.05 reached Feb. 1.

BrightPoint lowered its earnings forecast in late February following the loss of major customer Cricket Communications Inc. BrightPoint said it handled 6.8 million wireless devices last year on behalf of Cricket.

The company also has been hurt by the sinking fortunes of Research in Motion Ltd., the Toronto-based maker of the Blackberry. RIM had accounted for about 10 percent of BrightPoint's distribution business.

BrightPoint announced the Ingram Micro deal early Monday morning, a short time after releasing a statement saying it expected to post a 2-cent-per-share loss in the second quarter. In the statement, the company withdrew its prior financial guidance for the rest of the year.

BrightPoint shares surged Monday morning and were trading at $8.80 close to midday.

BrightPoint handled a record 112.2 million devices in 2011. Becoming part of the far-larger Ingram could help BrightPoint push that volume to another record this year, according to an analyst tracking the company who declined to be identified.

“It’s definitely a tough business environment out there and I think scale and global reach is becoming increasingly important,” he said. “BrightPoint does have good global scale but Ingram will take it to another level.”

BrightPoint has about 1,300 employees in the Indianapolis area, most of them in Plainfield, and about 4,000 worldwide.

BrightPoint and Ingram Micro did not say what impact the deal would have on BrightPoint's presence in the Indianapolis area or on the company’s overall work force. But the merged companies expect “to realize annual cost synergies and efficiencies in excess of $55 million by 2014," they said in a joint statement.

Executives of both companies declined to be more specific in a conference call with analysts late Monday morning.

“We’re considering all factors of potential synergies and integration opportunities, but we’re not going to go into further detail,” said Bill Humes, Ingram’s chief operating and financial officer. “We will update further going forward, but I do believe there are some great opportunities.”

Plainfield Town Manager Rich Carlucci said he hopes his community fares well in the acquisition and said BrightPoint's ownership of two large warehouses there should help its cause. One is in AirTech Park and the other in AllPoints Midwest.

“I would assume those are positives,” he said, “but we’ll have to see how this shakes out.”

BrightPoint laid off an undisclosed number of employees in March and decided not to fill another 120 open positions. BrightPoint has warehouse and distribution operations in Plainfield, where the company was founded in 1989. The company's headquarters is on the northwside side of Indianapolis.

Perhaps the biggest blow to BrightPoint came in late May when Research in Motion said it wouldn’t turn a profit in the current quarter and that it had hired investment bankers to explore strategic options, suggesting the company might be sold.

BrightPoint’s stock price dropped 21 percent the week following RIM’s announcement.

Completion of the Ingram deal would cause Indiana to lose one of its six Fortune 500 companies. BrightPoint ranks 463rd on the list, with $5.2 billion in revenue. Ingram, with $36.3 billion in revenue, ranks 81st.

The acquisition must be approved by BrightPoint shareholders, a step that is likely to occur in the third quarter. The deal should close by the end of the year.

BrightPoint founder, chairman and CEO Robert J. Laikin, 48, would remain with the merged company in a senior advisory role to Ingram CEO Alain Monie.

BrightPoint senior executives Mark Howell, Bruce Thomlinson, Anurag Gupta and Vincent Donargo have “committed to senior roles within the new organization,” the companies said.

BrightPoint went public in April 1994.

As a child, Laikin dreamed of leading a public company and was among the city’s youngest chief executives at the time of the initial public offering.

He launched his first company, Tickets Up Front, while pursuing a business degree from Indiana University. He quit college to run the company, which launched in 1985.

An offshoot, Tickets and Travel, followed in 1986, which grew to become one of the city’s largest travel agencies.

But in the spring of 1986, a man walked into Laikin’s Landmark Center office and changed his life, Laikin recalled in an IBJ interview a decade later. Arnie Goldberg, a salesman for Hellyer Communications Inc., pulled out a 25-pound briefcase and showed Laikin an early-model cell phone.

“I got real excited about the product,” Laikin said then. “He let me use it for a few days, and I said I have to have one—because I was traveling all the time and always in different cities, and it was an exciting new product.”

That chance meeting ultimately led Laikin to launch Wholesale Cellular USA Inc., later renamed BrightPoint.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Arlington,Tx Location
    So I wonder if they are planning to close down their Arlington,Tx location or shall I say wonder what their plans for it is....

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT