Dems, mayor reach budget deal that includes more police on streets

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Democrat-controlled City-County Council and Mayor Greg Ballard have come to terms on how to fund a projected $15 million budget shortfall for next year while putting more police officers on the streets.

Council President Maggie Lewis and mayoral Chief of Staff Ryan Vaughn announced the compromise Monday afternoon. The council voted 26-2 to approve the 2014 budget Monday evening. Republicans Bob Lutz and Christine Scales voted against the plan.

Under the agreement to cover the $15 million shortfall, the city would take a $6.9 million loan from an $80 million fiscal stability fund that helps the city maintain its AAA credit rating.

In addition, $5.7 million would come from the city’s portion of an escrow fund established following the city’s sale of its water and sewer systems to Citizens Energy Group in 2011. The remaining $2.4 million would come from the city's rainy-day fund.

For Democrats, the compromise avoids eliminating the homestead tax credit, which the mayor had proposed as a way of closing the funding gap. The entire city-county budget for 2014 is about $1 billion.

The three funds tapped to shore up the 2014 budget, however, are one-time budget sources, leaving more uncertainty for the following year.

“It truly reflects a compromise on both sides,” Lewis said of the agreement. “My colleagues recognize that this addresses 2014, and tomorrow we’re back at it to address 2015.”

Ballard said in a statement issued Monday afternoon that the deal helped avoid months of budget debates.

"This deal is not perfect as it delays long-term fiscal questions to 2015, but it will provide the necessary revenue to hire new police officers and continue making the necessary investments that make Indy a great place to live, work and raise a family," Ballard said.

If councilors approve the budget Monday night, it would fund a new class of 30 police recruits in April. Vaughn said plans still call for a class of 50 recruits late next year but “there was a desire to do something earlier.”

Those 80 recruits, in addition to 50 more expected in 2015, would give the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department a net gain of more than 80, when counting the officer positions that won’t be filled following retirements.

Related to the police staffing issue, Democratic Councilor John Barth will introduce a proposal at Monday’s meeting to create a bipartisan study commission to gauge the appropriate number of IMPD officers and to review and analyze long-term funding options. Barth said he wants to study the issue, regardless of how the city decided to fund public safety in 2014.

The 2014 budget also would fund raises for the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, under the same contract terms that have been accepted by the Indianapolis Fire Department.

The new contract provides firefighters a 3-percent raise effective July 1, a $1,256 base-salary increase in January 2015 and another $1,400 increase in January 2016.

“There’s going to be debate on the budget,” Lewis predicted for Monday’s night's meeting. “But when it’s time for us to vote, I would imagine we’ll come together and realize this is the right thing to do.”


  • Can you hear that sound
    Drip, drip, drip, drip.....usually we fix the drips not start them. As the counsel starts down the path of robbing funds to pay for things they want it will not be long before the drip destroys the foundation of the city.
  • Guns do help.
    Although we need more police officers, having a gun for self defense will help you more than a police officer (you can pull out a gun faster than the police officer will to you.)
  • Awww!
    Since it's exceedingly rare for Cops to actually prevent crimes, perhaps it would be far more efficient for the ADMINISTRATION to push for more citizens to obtain self defense firearms and then have the Cops provide firearms training to the citizens of Indianapolis. There's a lot to be said for the exhortation of "FIGHT CRIME, SHOOT BACK!"
  • Really? move to Detroit then
    brother pilgrim why don't you move to Detroit since you are such the expert on that city?
    • Good decision
      I think that they were very responsible to not get rid of the homestead credit. Good job.
      That's it! The DEMONCRAPTS, with the consent of the REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION, create ever more deferred debt, that can't possibly ever be paid. INDIANAPOLIS is well on it's way to being the NEXT DETROIT.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

      2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

      3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

      4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

      5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.