Dems, mayor reach budget deal that includes more police on streets

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Democrat-controlled City-County Council and Mayor Greg Ballard have come to terms on how to fund a projected $15 million budget shortfall for next year while putting more police officers on the streets.

Council President Maggie Lewis and mayoral Chief of Staff Ryan Vaughn announced the compromise Monday afternoon. The council voted 26-2 to approve the 2014 budget Monday evening. Republicans Bob Lutz and Christine Scales voted against the plan.

Under the agreement to cover the $15 million shortfall, the city would take a $6.9 million loan from an $80 million fiscal stability fund that helps the city maintain its AAA credit rating.

In addition, $5.7 million would come from the city’s portion of an escrow fund established following the city’s sale of its water and sewer systems to Citizens Energy Group in 2011. The remaining $2.4 million would come from the city's rainy-day fund.

For Democrats, the compromise avoids eliminating the homestead tax credit, which the mayor had proposed as a way of closing the funding gap. The entire city-county budget for 2014 is about $1 billion.

The three funds tapped to shore up the 2014 budget, however, are one-time budget sources, leaving more uncertainty for the following year.

“It truly reflects a compromise on both sides,” Lewis said of the agreement. “My colleagues recognize that this addresses 2014, and tomorrow we’re back at it to address 2015.”

Ballard said in a statement issued Monday afternoon that the deal helped avoid months of budget debates.

"This deal is not perfect as it delays long-term fiscal questions to 2015, but it will provide the necessary revenue to hire new police officers and continue making the necessary investments that make Indy a great place to live, work and raise a family," Ballard said.

If councilors approve the budget Monday night, it would fund a new class of 30 police recruits in April. Vaughn said plans still call for a class of 50 recruits late next year but “there was a desire to do something earlier.”

Those 80 recruits, in addition to 50 more expected in 2015, would give the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department a net gain of more than 80, when counting the officer positions that won’t be filled following retirements.

Related to the police staffing issue, Democratic Councilor John Barth will introduce a proposal at Monday’s meeting to create a bipartisan study commission to gauge the appropriate number of IMPD officers and to review and analyze long-term funding options. Barth said he wants to study the issue, regardless of how the city decided to fund public safety in 2014.

The 2014 budget also would fund raises for the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, under the same contract terms that have been accepted by the Indianapolis Fire Department.

The new contract provides firefighters a 3-percent raise effective July 1, a $1,256 base-salary increase in January 2015 and another $1,400 increase in January 2016.

“There’s going to be debate on the budget,” Lewis predicted for Monday’s night's meeting. “But when it’s time for us to vote, I would imagine we’ll come together and realize this is the right thing to do.”


  • Can you hear that sound
    Drip, drip, drip, drip.....usually we fix the drips not start them. As the counsel starts down the path of robbing funds to pay for things they want it will not be long before the drip destroys the foundation of the city.
  • Guns do help.
    Although we need more police officers, having a gun for self defense will help you more than a police officer (you can pull out a gun faster than the police officer will to you.)
  • Awww!
    Since it's exceedingly rare for Cops to actually prevent crimes, perhaps it would be far more efficient for the ADMINISTRATION to push for more citizens to obtain self defense firearms and then have the Cops provide firearms training to the citizens of Indianapolis. There's a lot to be said for the exhortation of "FIGHT CRIME, SHOOT BACK!"
  • Really? move to Detroit then
    brother pilgrim why don't you move to Detroit since you are such the expert on that city?
    • Good decision
      I think that they were very responsible to not get rid of the homestead credit. Good job.
      That's it! The DEMONCRAPTS, with the consent of the REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION, create ever more deferred debt, that can't possibly ever be paid. INDIANAPOLIS is well on it's way to being the NEXT DETROIT.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. The Walgreens did not get a lot of traffic. It was not located on the corner of the intersection, and not really visible from Emerson. Meanwhile the CVS there is huge and right on the corner. I am guessing a lot of people drove by a million times and never knew the Walgreens was there. Although, with the new Walmart market going in, that area could really see a lot of increase in traffic soon.

      2. You folks don't have a clue. There is a legal way to enter this country and to get aid. This left unchecked could run us to ruin quickly. I also heard that 'supporters' were getting major $$ to take them in? Who's monitoring this and guess who pays the bill? I support charitable organizations... but this is NOT the way to do it!

      3. Apparently at some time before alcohol has been served at the fair. The problem is that beer or wine used to be a common drink for people before soft drinks and was not thought to be that unusual. Since many folks now only drink to see how much they can drink or what kind of condition they can end up in it becomes more problematic. Go to Europe and its no big deal just as if you had sodas of milk to drink everyday. Its using common sense that is lacking now days.

      4. To address the epic failure of attracting race fans to both the Indy 500 and Brickyard 400 would take too much of my time to write. Bottom line Boles is clueless and obviously totally out of touch with the real paying fan base. I see nothing but death spin coming for the Brickyard, just like Indy. Get somebody in a place of power that understands what race fans want.

      5. I am a race fan through & through. It doesn't matter if it's Indy cars or Nascar. I love a great race. I go to several other tracks each year and you can see the entire track. I know Indy has tradition, but fans want to see the entire race. I sit in the Penthouse, am almost 60 years old, and would like to see a better TV screen in turn 1 so you can see the entire race. Then I think Indy needs to install an escalator so us old folks can make it up to the Penthouse and down again if we want more options to purchase food and drinks. Just a race fans opinion. Lights won't make the race any better, but you might be able to see the TV better at night. Turn 1's screen needs replaced with a better and bigger screen.