IBJNews

UPDATE: Steak n Shake turning away from core business

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Steak n Shake Co. is taking a dramatic turn away from its core business with a bid to purchase a Michigan insurer in a deal valued at almost $37 million.

The Indianapolis-based burger chain, now operated as a holding company with activist-investor-turned-CEO Sardar Biglari at the helm, has offered to acquire the outstanding shares of Fremont Michigan Insuracorp Inc. for $24.50 per share in cash and stock, an 11.3 percent premium to Monday's closing price.

It's the second major deal this year for Steak n Shake. The company acquired Virginia-based Western Sizzlin Corp.—another restaurant chain where Biglari is chairman and CEO—for $39 million in a deal finalized this fall.

While Wall Street applauded the latest deal, sending shares up more than 17 percent to $345 in morning trading, local investment advisers say the company is wandering away from its specialty into uncharted territory.

"It's hard to see how burgers and insurance policies go together,"  said George Farra, co-founder and principal of Woodley Farra Manion Portfolio Management. "I'm very concerned that one of the few local publicly traded companies—its focus is being diverted to build a financial services empire without much of a track record behind it."

Steak n Shake disclosed that it had purchased a roughly 10-percent stake in Fremont in October, shortly after CEO Sardar Biglari said he intended to transform Steak n Shake into a holding company to pursue purchases “either related or unrelated to its ongoing business activities.”

The company has not revealed its plans for Fremont, but observers say Biglari wants to use the firm's $60 million investment portfolio to fund more acquisitions, following in the footsteps of his investing hero, Warren Buffett.

Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway acquired its first insurer in the 1960s and now funds billions of dollars in investments through the portfolios of its insurance companies.

Biglari, a 32-year-old hedge fund manager, last week initiated a 1-for-20 reverse stock split that has elevated Steak n Shake shares above $300 apiece, the highest among listed restaurant companies. The move was another nod to Buffett; Berkshire A shares trade for about $99,000.

The moves come at the beginning of a turnaround for Steak n Shake, which this year snapped a 14-quarter streak of declining same-store sales.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT