U.S. attorney sues GOP donor over unpaid trading penalty

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The federal government is suing a former Indianapolis businessman and major Republican donor to collect a $600,000 federal penalty for commodities trading violations.

The U.S. attorney's office sued Jerry W. Slusser on Thursday to collect the penalty from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Slusser, who now lives in Las Vegas, was found liable for multiple violations of the commodity exchange act in 1999, but the penalty wasn't imposed until 2006 after he filed numerous appeals.

Officials say Slusser has not made any payment toward the debt, which also includes interest.

Slusser was the owner of First Republic Financial Corp. (formerly known as Vancorp Financial Services) of Indianapolis, which misappropriated nearly $6 million of customer funds and made material misrepresentations and omissions of facts to customers in 1989.

Campaign finance reports on the Indiana Secretary of State's website show Slusser has donated $103,000 in cash and $148,000 in in-kind contributions to various GOP committees. Slusser has given to Gov. Mitch Daniels and his Aiming Higher political action committee.

Daniels' spokeswoman Jane Jankowski said Daniels didn't know Slusser when the violations occurred and was unaware of them.

Slusser had an unlisted phone number and couldn't be reached for comment.

Slusser's attorney, James Voyles, said in a statement that the case was without merit and would be "vigorously defended."

Voyles said the case stemmed from a business transaction in Europe some 22 years ago, and that the statute of limitations had expired.

"Mr. Slusser has fought this battle several times over the past 20 years, and we intend to fight it again and firmly believe we will prevail in the present issue," Voyles said.



  • I know nothing
    How many of Mitch's buds are going to be have been under investigation? Are any of the donations to his run for gov, or aiming higher legitimate?
  • surprisesd?
    The Mitch Daniels house of cards.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.