USA Track & Field hit with wrongful termination suit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Former USA Track and Field CEO Doug Logan filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against the governing body Wednesday, seeking payment after suddenly being fired last month following a 26-month tenure.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Indianapolis, seeks unspecified compensatory damages for terminating his contract, which lasted through 2013 and had about $1.7 million still to be paid.

USATF Chairwoman Stephanie Hightower released a statement saying Indianapolis-based USA Track and Field would vigorously defend itself against the lawsuit.

"The filing of this suit and its ultimate resolution will not affect USATF and how we serve the sport," Hightower said.

Logan would not comment when reached by The Associated Press.

The lawsuit, however, was in line with Logan's previous claims that he was fired without cause. USATF, meanwhile, has said it has reasons for firing the outspoken CEO in September and doesn't owe him anything.

Logan has admitted to being a lightning rod who did not get along well with many of the members and volunteers in the track world, but said that's what the sport needed to lift itself out of the doldrums after languishing through years of doping scandals and bad characters.

Should Logan receive the remainder owed to him on his contract, it would represent a significant chunk of cash for an organization that operated on a budget of about $15 million last year and had cash reserves of about $3 million.

A few weeks after his firing, Logan revealed to the AP that he had signed a new contract that gave him a $140,000-a-year increase in base salary on June 26, only nine days before USATF began the process of terminating him. Hightower said the contract negotiations and the review of Logan's job performance were being handled on separate tracks and happened to collide.

The terms of the new contract would leave USATF on the hook for an extra $465,000 if Logan were to receive the entire payout.

Though Logan has insisted USATF never had cause to fire him, the lawsuit seeks to take advantage of the fact that Logan signed a new contract so close to the time he was fired.

"Nothing that Logan did or failed to do between June 26 and September 13, 2010, constitutes 'Cause' to terminate his employment under the Second Employment Agreement," the lawsuit states.

The lawsuit also states that USATF offered Logan a $500,000 severance in exchange for a promise to not file suit, but Logan refused.

USATF has begun the search for Logan's successor and hopes to hire someone by early next year.


  • Circus
    USATF's board is full of baffoons and crooks. I bet the chair's buddy, an attorney, will rack up big fees to defend this suit, lose and cost the organization even more money.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1