IBJNews

USA Track & Field hit with wrongful termination suit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Former USA Track and Field CEO Doug Logan filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against the governing body Wednesday, seeking payment after suddenly being fired last month following a 26-month tenure.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Indianapolis, seeks unspecified compensatory damages for terminating his contract, which lasted through 2013 and had about $1.7 million still to be paid.

USATF Chairwoman Stephanie Hightower released a statement saying Indianapolis-based USA Track and Field would vigorously defend itself against the lawsuit.

"The filing of this suit and its ultimate resolution will not affect USATF and how we serve the sport," Hightower said.

Logan would not comment when reached by The Associated Press.

The lawsuit, however, was in line with Logan's previous claims that he was fired without cause. USATF, meanwhile, has said it has reasons for firing the outspoken CEO in September and doesn't owe him anything.

Logan has admitted to being a lightning rod who did not get along well with many of the members and volunteers in the track world, but said that's what the sport needed to lift itself out of the doldrums after languishing through years of doping scandals and bad characters.

Should Logan receive the remainder owed to him on his contract, it would represent a significant chunk of cash for an organization that operated on a budget of about $15 million last year and had cash reserves of about $3 million.

A few weeks after his firing, Logan revealed to the AP that he had signed a new contract that gave him a $140,000-a-year increase in base salary on June 26, only nine days before USATF began the process of terminating him. Hightower said the contract negotiations and the review of Logan's job performance were being handled on separate tracks and happened to collide.

The terms of the new contract would leave USATF on the hook for an extra $465,000 if Logan were to receive the entire payout.

Though Logan has insisted USATF never had cause to fire him, the lawsuit seeks to take advantage of the fact that Logan signed a new contract so close to the time he was fired.

"Nothing that Logan did or failed to do between June 26 and September 13, 2010, constitutes 'Cause' to terminate his employment under the Second Employment Agreement," the lawsuit states.

The lawsuit also states that USATF offered Logan a $500,000 severance in exchange for a promise to not file suit, but Logan refused.

USATF has begun the search for Logan's successor and hopes to hire someone by early next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Circus
    USATF's board is full of baffoons and crooks. I bet the chair's buddy, an attorney, will rack up big fees to defend this suit, lose and cost the organization even more money.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT