IBJNews

USA Track & Field struggling to find new CEO

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Nine months after firing CEO Doug Logan, Indianapolis-based USA Track & Field is still looking to fill its top job.

Officials had hoped to have a replacement named well in advance of the U.S. Track & Field Championships June 23-26 in Oregon, but that’s not going to happen.

Steve Miller, the board member who is leading the search committee to find a new CEO, told the Chicago Tribune recently that he hopes to present a CEO candidate to the board at its meetings during the national championships later this month.

But sources close to the sport's governing body said there are signs that board members can’t agree on who will make a suitable replacement for Logan, and that one of their own is increasingly interested in the job.

“This has been a lot more protracted than I imagined,” Miller told the Tribune. “We can’t afford to fail, and in our desire to get this right, we have gone around and around.”

Miller thought he had the perfect candidate earlier this year, but after several interviews, University of Oregon track coach Vin Lananna decided to stay at his current job.

USATF officials won’t say who is being considered for the position, but track and field sources said board member Stephanie Hightower has strong interest in the job. Hightower could not be reached for comment.

Greg Harger, who operates an Indianapolis-based track and field team comprised of Olympic hopefuls, thinks Hightower’s interest in the job is part of the reason USATF is having difficulty finding a leader.

“I think people in this sport know she’s interested, and that has potential to undermine the process,” Harger said.

Hiring a board member as CEO runs counter to new policies the U.S. Olympic Committee has asked U.S. sports federations to follow. The policies include not allowing non-paid board members to transition into paid staff. Another calls for security in the role of CEO.

Miller told the Tribune there are three options if a candidate can’t be found soon: Keep interim CEO Mike McNees, USATF’s chief financial officer, in place through the 2012 London Olympics; name Hightower as interim CEO; or allow the agency to operate temporarily without a CEO.

In the meantime, Harger said the transition seems to be leading to lots of confusion.

“It looks like a real struggle to put things in order there,” Harger said. “We’re in the qualifying window for the Olympics and it’s not been published when that window begins or what the qualifying standards are. [USATF leaders] have a lot of work to do to get themselves re-organized.”

At least USATF has ended a fight with its former CEO. In April, USATF settled a lawsuit with Logan, who sued to have the balance of his contract—about $1.7 million—paid to him after he was suddenly dismissed last September. Details of the settlement were not disclosed.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT