IBJNews

USA Track & Field struggling to find new CEO

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Nine months after firing CEO Doug Logan, Indianapolis-based USA Track & Field is still looking to fill its top job.

Officials had hoped to have a replacement named well in advance of the U.S. Track & Field Championships June 23-26 in Oregon, but that’s not going to happen.

Steve Miller, the board member who is leading the search committee to find a new CEO, told the Chicago Tribune recently that he hopes to present a CEO candidate to the board at its meetings during the national championships later this month.

But sources close to the sport's governing body said there are signs that board members can’t agree on who will make a suitable replacement for Logan, and that one of their own is increasingly interested in the job.

“This has been a lot more protracted than I imagined,” Miller told the Tribune. “We can’t afford to fail, and in our desire to get this right, we have gone around and around.”

Miller thought he had the perfect candidate earlier this year, but after several interviews, University of Oregon track coach Vin Lananna decided to stay at his current job.

USATF officials won’t say who is being considered for the position, but track and field sources said board member Stephanie Hightower has strong interest in the job. Hightower could not be reached for comment.

Greg Harger, who operates an Indianapolis-based track and field team comprised of Olympic hopefuls, thinks Hightower’s interest in the job is part of the reason USATF is having difficulty finding a leader.

“I think people in this sport know she’s interested, and that has potential to undermine the process,” Harger said.

Hiring a board member as CEO runs counter to new policies the U.S. Olympic Committee has asked U.S. sports federations to follow. The policies include not allowing non-paid board members to transition into paid staff. Another calls for security in the role of CEO.

Miller told the Tribune there are three options if a candidate can’t be found soon: Keep interim CEO Mike McNees, USATF’s chief financial officer, in place through the 2012 London Olympics; name Hightower as interim CEO; or allow the agency to operate temporarily without a CEO.

In the meantime, Harger said the transition seems to be leading to lots of confusion.

“It looks like a real struggle to put things in order there,” Harger said. “We’re in the qualifying window for the Olympics and it’s not been published when that window begins or what the qualifying standards are. [USATF leaders] have a lot of work to do to get themselves re-organized.”

At least USATF has ended a fight with its former CEO. In April, USATF settled a lawsuit with Logan, who sued to have the balance of his contract—about $1.7 million—paid to him after he was suddenly dismissed last September. Details of the settlement were not disclosed.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT