IBJNews

Venture firms recapitalize Advanced Physical Therapy LLC

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Locally based venture capital firms Cardinal Equity Partners and Centerfield Capital Partners have joined with Chicago-based bank Harris NA to recapitalize locally based Advanced Physical Therapy LLC, the state’s largest independent physical therapy provider.

Terms of the deal were not disclosed. But Cardinal, which has $50 million under management, typically invests $2 million to $7 million in companies with annual sales of $5 million to $50 million. With $160 million under management, Centerfield typically invests $2 million to $8 million in firms with $15 million to $75 million in annual revenue.

Advanced Physical Therapy operates in 17 locations, focusing on Worker’s Compensation cases and workplace injury-prevention consulting services. It was founded in 1985 by JoAnne Bozza-Jonathan, who remains CEO after the deal.

On its Web site, Cardinal describes a recapitalization as a deal allowing owners of a closely held business to “take some ‘chips off the table’ while continuing to retain a significant level of ownership and management responsibility.” According to Cardinal, divesting partial ownership allows the investors to help grow companies by offering founders “a second bite of the apple.”

On her company’s Web site, Jonathan describes the challenge of independently operating a health care business in today’s changing medical environment:

“Over the past five years, many privately owned medical practices have sold to large corporations or hospitals, but I am proud to say I have resisted the ‘sellout’ trend,” she wrote. “I feel that today, maybe more than ever, it is critical to deliver care in a manner that leaves patients feeling like a person, not a number.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT