LOU'S VIEWS: Very different stages at Theatre on the Square

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry
ae-2rooms-2-1col.jpg Lisa Marie Smith in “Two Rooms.” (Photo/Roy Chamberlin)

On one stage: a semi-musical version of a 1970s adult film (sans extreme naughty bits).

On the other stage: a harrowing drama exploring both the personal and the global impact of a hostage situation in the Middle East.

You won’t find greater theatrical diversity under one roof than the one-two punch being delivered now at Theatre on the Square. OK, so one is an actual TOTS production and the other comes courtesy of an outside production company, but still, the contrast is difficult to avoid.

Let’s start with “Debbie Does Dallas” (through Feb. 2) and give a few extra points to TOTS for having the guts to program a semi-Super-Bowl-related show while most other arts organizations are collecting their space rental fees and fleeing to their living rooms until the game is over.

“Debbie,” which generated some interest off-Broadway, holds the attractive promise of titillation combined with ironic detachment. Audience members who wouldn’t admit they have seen the original—or any of the thousands of its skin-flick ilk—can comfortably go to a theater without guilt to see the saga of a group of high school cheerleaders who realize there’s a less time-consuming way to make money than car washes and baby-sitting.

ae-debbie-1col.jpg The ladies of “Debbie Does Dallas.” (Photo/Aaron Swartz)

How graphic does it get? Well, there’s no doubt what these cheerleaders are doing to earn the cash for their trip to the title town. But while it’s got scenes that take place in a locker room shower and a candle shop (don’t ask), “Debbie” is tame compared with some of the skin-revealing shows that have been featured on TOTS stages.

More important, how entertaining is it?

If only the show itself delivered on its silly promise. Not that I expected Ibsen from a show whose script is taken largely from the original film (or so I’m told), but while the cast is playful and game, the writers seem to be going through the motions.

Scene after scene in “Debbie Does Dallas” ends not at an interesting place but when the characters run out of things to say and just chirp “bye” before exiting. A few fun, earnest songs hint at the giddy show this could be, but the tunes are few, short and far between (and one in the second act seems dropped in from another show). A meta-moment late in the show commenting on the action doesn’t quite work. As directed here, the show often clunks where it should move, turning what should be a fun hour and a half/no intermission frivolity into a too-long two hours.

Still, there are some good laughs, an actor with a textbook 1970s moustache, a few sweet musical moments, and, for the prurient, a quartet of lovely young women willing to do anything for a buck.


Not only is newcomer Acting Up Productions’ latest show worlds away from “Debbie Does Dallas,” it’s worlds away from the previous Acting Up show I caught, Halloween week’s “Night of the Living Dead.”

Sam Fain in "Two Rooms." Sam Fain plays a political prisoner yearning for home in “Two Rooms.” (Photo/Roy Chamberlin)

But that title could also apply to “Two Rooms” (running through Jan 22).

Originally staged in 1988, Lee Blessing’s harrowing drama concerns another kind of living dead, a Beirut college teacher held prisoner in the Middle East and his wife creating her own kind of prison stateside.

How do you grieve the loss of someone who isn’t dead? How do you find hope when everything is out of your control? Do you listen to the officious government official and just keep your mouth shut? Or do you give in to a journalist’s efforts to get you to speak out on … what? Wanting your husband back?

It helps considerably that lead Sam Fain compellingly captures the resignation, befuddlement, exhaustion and sensory focus/unfocus of a man who has been robbed of the ability to keep track of days. In the tougher role, Lisa Marie Smith is strong as a woman trying to hold onto her faraway husband by building a sacred space out of his former home office.

Despite some moments where subtlety instead of shouts might have better served the characters, both understand that people in isolation have unexpected epiphanies.

The reporter (Scot Greenwall) could be a stock character, but here he seems uncertain of the honorability of his behavior and his unspoken feelings toward his subject, giving their scenes a rich inner life. I wish something similar could be said about the official who, in the writing and the performing, comes across as a stock type, out of place among the trio of full-bodied characters on stage.

The play has an urgent truth to it not because it makes big, jingoistic political statements but because Blessing has such a strong understanding of people who exist in a world beyond their control.

Sadly, “Two Rooms” is all too relevant in today’s world.

Happily, Acting Up Productions proves with “Two Rooms” that it’s serious about adding quality drama to the local theater scene.•


This columns appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com


  • The Government Official
    "I wish something similar could be said about the official who, in the writing and the performing, comes across as a stock type, out of place among the trio of full-bodied characters on stage."

    I concur with the analysis and review of Two Rooms except for one point. In this age of extreme cynicism towards the searing incapability of the government to address any of the needs of the public, a one dimensional indifference and coldness in the government official *may in fact BE* as full bodied a character as the viewing public is willing to accept at this point. It fits exactly what we expect of the government and personally filled me with indignant rage. I think she accomplished exactly what was expected of and needed in this role, and the others filled in the human dimension in theirs, helping us relate to the emotionally remote stories of hostages and the plight of their families in a world filled with chaos, uncertainty, and bereft of anyone batting for the home team.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...