IBJNews

Veteran Deloitte managing partner retiring

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Michael Becher, the longtime managing partner of Deloitte LLP’s Indianapolis office, will retire June 1, the New York-based accounting firm said on Wednesday.

Becher’s career at Deloitte spans 36 years, including 20 years as the local office’s leader.
 
Located in Chase Tower, Deloitte is the city’s fifth-largest accounting firm based on number of certified public accountants employed, according to IBJ statistics. The firm has 69 CPAs and 139 employees.

The firm named Mary Boelke to replace Becher. She earned a bachelor’s degree in accounting from Indiana University and will be relocating from Dallas to Indianapolis with her husband and two children. Boelke practiced for nine years at Deloitte’s local office before serving as tax managing partner at the firm’s San Jose and Dallas locations.

“As a native Hoosier, it’s an honor to return to my deep roots in Indiana to lead our practice,” she said in a prepared statement. “I’m eager to build on our success under Mike’s leadership and to continue to develop our talent, enhance our brand in the marketplace and maintain our commitment to the Indianapolis communities.”

Among the Indianapolis-area's 20 largest accounting firms, Boelke will be one of two female managing partners. The other is Anita Sherman, who serves as co-managing partner with Larry Greenwalt at Greenwalt CPAs Inc.

Becher, 59, said will remain active on several business and civic boards of directors, including the United Way of Central Indiana, the Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, Marian University and the Boy Scouts of America Crossroads of America Council.
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Correction regarding co-managing partners at Greenwalt CPAs
    Congratulations on a successful career Mike, and to Mary as the incoming managing partner. Just to clarify, Anita Sherman is the President and Managing Partner at Greenwalt CPAs, and Larry Greenwalt is the Chairman of the Board. We have never had co-managing partners.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT