IBJNews

Wall Street observers blast Emmis plan to ax preferred shares

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Emmis Communications Corp.'s effort to strip its preferred shareholders of their rights and avoid forking over about $10 million in unpaid dividends is drawing sharp criticism from top market observers, including a columnist for The New York Times.

The struggling Indianapolis media company hopes to recapitalize in part by neutralizing its preferred shareholders without paying four years' worth of unpaid 6.25-percent annual dividends. Emmis would reimburse some shareholders with the equivalent of just $2 toward the $50 face value of their preferred stock.

Emmis has repurchased 61 percent of its preferred shares for about $15 apiece but has left voting rights with the previous holders, who agreed to vote on Emmis’ behalf to extinguish the rights of preferred shareholders. Companies generally cannot vote their own retired shares.

But the company is still short of the two-thirds vote required to get rid of the preferred shares, so it plans to issue 400,000 new preferred shares to an employee benefit trust—shares management would have the authority to vote.

CEO Jeff Smulyan, who controls the common shares via a special class, voted to approve the creation of the employee benefit trust Monday. No date has been set for a second vote that would eliminate the preferred shares, including the right of holders to appoint directors.

If that vote is successful for Emmis management, remaining holders of $50 preferred shares could convert them into 2.44 common shares apiece. At current prices, that works out to about $2.

Emmis is asking a Marion Superior Court judge to declare the plan legal in a preemptive bid to prevent preferred shareholders unhappy with the plan from challenging its validity in court. Judge Cynthia Ayers has yet to rule on the request.

The company’s actions look like a “desperate” maneuver—not “on the up and up”—to save a sinking business facing new competitors and a big drop in revenue, said Mark D. Foster, chief investment officer of Kirr Marbach & Co. in Columbus, Ind.

“I’m not sure I’ve ever seen that approach before,” Foster said. “They’re at the point of trying whatever they can to save the business. If you want to survive, you have to be creative. This is what they came up with.”

The company is in a tough spot, and canceling the preferred shares could save it and prove a boon to common shareholders, Foster said. But it’s the kind of move a company can only do once.

Foster compared the approach to that of the Obama administration when it forced bondholders in Chrysler to take a hit in the company's bankruptcy.

Columnist Floyd Norris of The New York Times wrote that if Emmis gets away with its gambit, Indianapolis will become the “Chicago of capitalism.”

“Emmis and its controlling shareholder have hatched an ingenious plan to make the company’s preferred shares all but worthless and strip them of their rights,” Norris wrote. “To do that requires getting two-thirds of the preferred shares to agree, which would normally be impossible. But not if Emmis can persuade a state judge in Indiana to bless its strategy to allow dead shares to be voted.”

Companies that buy back and retire their shares cannot turn around and vote the shares.

Emmis issued a rebuke to the Norris column, saying it didn’t fully represent Emmis’ stance on the preferred shares.

“We offered a transparent process to all our preferred shareholders, including the few remaining holdouts,” the company said in a statement. “Holders of the vast majority of preferred shares saw the offer as fair and reasonable, and accepted it.”

In an interview Monday, Smulyan said the remaining preferred shareholders are being greedy, trying to recover much more than they paid for their shares.

"They said these shares had a $50 value," Smulyan said. "They did. But these people didn't buy them at that price. Most people bought this at a nominal amount of money and now they're trying to block the company."

Norris’ column in the Times is charitable compared with that of James Grant, editor of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, who described Emmis’ efforts to wipe out preferred holders as a “fatwa” in a column published March 23.

Grant took particular issue with the company’s plan to use so-called swap agreements to vote the shares it has repurchased and issue 400,000 new shares to an employee retirement trust—all so Emmis can put together a two-thirds majority to vote to “extinguish” the remaining one-third of its preferred shares.

“At stake is more than the future of a dwindling, idiosyncratically governed Indianapolis media company,” Grant wrote. “Victory by Emmis over the preferred would tend to impair the standing of preferred stock as a national asset class and compromise the position of minority investors. More importantly, the insiders’ success would shake the presumption that contract law applies even when, from the point of view of the insiders, it would be more convenient if it didn’t.”

Emmis said four institutional holders and one individual investor who own its preferred shares are holding out on the plan.

The move is the latest step in Emmis’ quest to free itself from the burdensome requirements of the preferred stock. The shares are supposed to pay 6.25 percent, but the financially strapped company has been exercising its right to suspend payments since October 2008.

From then through early December 2011, $26.7 million in unpaid dividends piled up as liabilities on Emmis’ balance sheet.

Investors also are scheduled to consider authorizing a reverse stock split that would push the price of the company’s shares above $1 each.

NASDAQ has been threatening to delist the shares because they have closed below the $1 threshold since July. Company shares were fetching 83 cents each in late-morning trading.

Emmis owns 17 FM and two AM radio stations nationwide, and seven city and specialty magazines. Locally, it operates WFNI-AM 1070, WIBC-FM 93.1, WLHK-FM 97.1 and WYXB-FM 105.7, as well as Indianapolis Monthly magazine.

Editor's note: This story has been updated with a clarification that Emmis is not trying to literally cancel its preferred shares, but to remove special rights of preferred shareholders, and to reflect a smaller total of unpaid dividends since Emmis does not owe dividends on the 61 percent of the preferred shares it has repurchased.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Greedy???
    The company is making money!! The cash from recent sales would more than cover the dividend exposure. I'd like to hear from other individual shareholders in Indiana...It's not just the large investors, it's those of us who invested in Emmis, with an legal, binding agreement who are being screwed...I'm not being greedy...I think the Company (JS,et al) is being greedy...
  • Sinking Ship
    Declare bankruptcy and completely wipe out the preferred shareholders if they don't like this plan.

    Let's be honest, Smulyan took out all the cash from selling the TV stations as special dividends after a failed effort to take the company private at a discounted price. The company has been cutting ever since.

    Maybe bankruptcy is the only way to get this company back on track.


    • Sell The Coastal Assets
      There are great many young funds that would love to own Los Angeles Magazine and t Hot97 (WQHT) radio station in New York...so why not package and sell them. Use the proceeds to find new opportunities for growth.
    • Interesting to ask a judge to approve illegal activities
      I find it very interesting that a company can select a judge to give blessings for defrauding bond investors. But, then I question our injustice system.
    • TARP
      Well, it worked for Wall Street, so maybe the investors can ask the US Congress for a "TARP like Bailout". Whatever happened to the theory of risk when investing in a company. I guess "Let the Buyer Beware" was lost on these investors.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

    2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

    3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

    4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

    5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

    ADVERTISEMENT