IBJNews

WellPoint board declares 25-cent dividend

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

WellPoint Inc. announced its first dividend payment on Wednesday as it became the latest health insurer to reward shareholders with a quarterly payout after piling up cash from a string of strong financial performances.

Big health insurers used to offer token dividends, if any, like the 4-cent annual one Aetna Inc. paid last November. But that started to change last year when UnitedHealth Group Inc. — the largest health insurer based on revenue — announced a quarterly dividend of 12.5 cents per share.

Indianapolis-based WellPoint said its board declared a quarterly cash dividend of 25 cents per share, payable March 25 to shareholders of record as of March 10.

Aetna said earlier this month it will now pay a 15-cent quarterly dividend on April 29 to shareholders as of April 14. That dividend offers the highest yield, 1.6 percent, of the three insurers based on Tuesday's stock closing prices.

The steady cash flow from larger dividends can make a company's stock more attractive to investors. This is especially true in the managed care sector, where investors have worried about how companies will be affected by the massive health care overhaul, which aims to cover millions of people but will impose a host of new taxes and restrictions on insurers.

"If you're providing dividends, it says maybe things are not as bad as you thought they were in terms of the new health care law," said Robert Laszewski, a former insurance executive who's now a consultant.

Health insurers are coming off strong performances in recent quarters. Many have reported better-than-expected earnings helped in part by improved pricing of their products and a slowdown in health care use. WellPoint's fourth-quarter profit easily topped Wall Street expectations, and analysts have said they expected the insurer to announce a dividend on Wednesday, when the company meets with investors in Indianapolis.

Stronger financial performances have given insurers a growing supply of cash to spend after stocking the reserves they need to keep for claims. Dividends are an option for that money, especially when there are few prospective acquisitions out there for big companies to make, said Laszewski, president of Health Policy and Strategy Associates.

Another option is share buybacks. WellPoint also said Wednesday its board also boosted the company's repurchase authorization to $1.6 billion in 2011.

One option companies probably won't take is using that excess cash to reduce premiums, even though shareholder dividend payments may invite fresh criticism of the industry. Some insurers, including WellPoint, took heat last year for jacking premiums in individual insurance markets while reporting rich profits.

Using cash to lower premiums would only be a temporary solution that does nothing to solve the underlying problem of spiraling care costs, Laszewski said. It also would delay rate increases for a year because cost increases aren't going away. The premium increase would compound and create an even bigger headache.

"Subsidizing these rates for one year would really be a stupid thing to do because you only create a much bigger problem for consumers and regulators in two years and therefore (insurers)," he said.

Also on Wednesday, WellPoint reaffirmed 2011 earnings expectations of $6.30 per share, which was originally below Wall Street forecasts. Insurers have said they expect the overhaul to have more of an impact on their performance this year, and a return to normal health care use also will pressure their profits.

WellPoint's forecast is now above the average analyst expectation of $6.56 per share, according to FactSet.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT