WellPoint boosts third-quarter profit, raises forecast

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Third-quarter profits rose slightly at WellPoint Inc. but soared above Wall Street expectations.

The Indianapolis-based health insurer raised its full-year profit forecast by 20 cents per share, excluding investment gains, to $6.45 per share.

WellPoint earned $739 million during the three months ended Sept. 30, a 1 percent gain over the same quarter a year ago. The profits were driven by lower-than-expected claims expenses and lower administrative costs.

Profits per share totaled $1.84. But excluding investment gains of 10 cents, the company would have earned $1.74 per share, a slight decrease from the $1.78 per share it earned a year ago.

Still, the performance soared above analysts’ consensus forecasts of $1.57 per share, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

Quarterly revenue of $14.6 billion also edged analysts’ expectations, even though it fell 5 percent from the same quarter last year.

"We are pleased with our third-quarter performance, which exceeded our forecast primarily due to higher than anticipated favorable reserve development and disciplined administrative expense control. Membership was stable in the quarter, and we continued to grow our Blue-branded businesses," CEO Angela Braly said in a statement.

WellPoint had 33.5 million members in its health plans as of Sept. 30, unchanged from June 30, but down by 382,000 members from this time last year. Unemployment has hurt WellPoint’s membership totals in the past two years.

The company’s percentage of revenue spent on overhead fell to 14.6 percent in the quarter, compared with 14.9 percent a year ago.

For all of 2010, WellPoint now expects to earn $6.60 per share, including 18 cents of investment gains. The company also recorded an accounting charge of 3 cents per share.

WellPoint’s shares closed Tuesday at $55.75 apiece. The stock price has rallied in the past two months by more than 12 percent, but are still down 4.4 percent for the year.


  • No Surprise
    This is no surprise as we our rates are going up 15% even though our premium to loss ratio is within guidelines that they set.. Health insurance companies should not be for profit- no shareholders.. it is all about the bottom line..
  • thanks, Wellpoint
    Of course, they're making record profits by screwing over their customers. Our small business has Anthem as the health insurance provider. Even with an HSA plan, we just learned that Anthem intends to raise our premiums 35% for next year - gee, thanks, Wellpoint for sticking it to businesses who are already struggling to survive!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.