WellPoint CEO: Acquisitions of hospitals, doctors unlikely

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

New WellPoint CEO Joe Swedish threw cold-water Wednesday on widespread speculation that he will lead the company through a new wave of hospital and doctor acquisitions.

Swedish, who took the helm of the Indianapolis-based health insurer a month ago, also talked about leading WellPoint for the next decade, a period in which he expects the entire health care industry to shift to serve customers more like retailers.

Swedish, 61, had spent his entire career managing hospitals, including the past eight years as CEO of Michigan-based Trinity Health Corp., a Catholic hospital system. But in spite of many questions about the prospect, he’s not looking to get back in that business.

“To be clear, I do not currently see vertical integration as a likely path for WellPoint,” Swedish said during an investor conference call Wednesday morning. “The models are so divergent that it just does not seem to be the best use of capital.”

Analysts, investors, local health care providers and even WellPoint’s own employees have been asking about the possibility of WellPoint acquiring hospitals and doctors since Swedish was named to replace former WellPoint CEO Angela Braly in mid-February.

When Swedish’s appointment was announced, Wedbush Securities analyst Sarah James said his background as a hospital CEO fit right in with the industry trend of health insurers acquiring more health care providers.

“We view vertical integration as one of the key themes for the industry over the next 5-10 years,” James wrote in a Feb. 13 note to investors. “There is a range of savings numbers emerging from insurers that used integrated care models,” and, she added, “we see vertical integration as a way to reduce medical expense.”

WellPoint already spent $800 million in 2011 to acquire California-based CareMore, which operates clinics and a health plan for seniors in the federal Medicare program. WellPoint has replicated CareMore to operate more than 25 clinics.

Swedish emphasized that WellPoint is moving to work more closely with health care providers than the confrontational stand that it and most health insurers have taken in the past. But he spoke about new kinds of contracts, rather than acquisitions.

“[We] will certainly engage with leading providers that are similarly addressing cost efficiency challenges and are willing to align with our products and networks,” Swedish said on Wednesday.

Swedish has enjoyed a favorable start to his tenure, as WellPoint reported better-than-expected financial results for the quarter ended March 31.

The Indianapolis-based health insurer earned $885.2 million in the first three months of the year, or $2.89 per share. Profit was 3.4 percent higher than in the same quarter a year ago.

Excluding investment losses and other extraordinary charges, the company would have earned $2.94 per share, a nearly 26-percent increase over the same quarter last year.

On that basis, analysts were expecting profit of $2.38 per share, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

The higher earnings prompted WellPoint to raise its full-year profit forecast to $7.75 per share, up from its previous prediction of $7.60 per share. Wall Street analysts have been forecasting $7.78 per share, even before WellPoint’s better-than-expected first-quarter results.

WellPoint’s revenue in the quarter was $17.7 billion, below analysts’ predictions of $18 billion, but up 15 percent from a year ago.

The company lost 321,000 insurance plan members during the quarter, with the losses concentrated in its senior plans, local group employers, individuals and Medicaid plans. Its total enrollment in health plans stands at 35.8 million.

Investors cheered the financial results, bidding up WellPoint's stock price as much as 7 percent in morning trading, to a recent $73.09.

Swedish said he’s spending his first 90 to 120 days on the job working to understand WellPoint’s business, including the issues that were preventing it from achieving its full potential under Braly, who resigned amid investor anger in August.

“I recognize that performance over the last five years was inconsistent,” Swedish said in a reference to Braly’s five years leading the company. “I know the issues that created the volatility, but I want to better understand some of the dynamics that contributed to the deviation and expected performance.”

Swedish also said he’s working to understand whether WellPoint is positioned well for 2014, when new health insurance exchanges created by President Obama’s 2010 health reform law start up. That could disrupt the part of WellPoint’s business from which it derives a large portion of its profits.

In the long term, Swedish said, the exchanges, where customers will buy insurance largely on their own, as well as continued efforts to expose consumers to price and quality information about health care providers, will push health care toward a retail environment.

Right now, the financing of health care operates in a largely wholesale environment, where health insurers, governments and employers do most of the buying of health care, using a language of codes and billing practices that are nearly indecipherable to average consumers.

That transition, Swedish said, will put enormous pressure on health care costs.

“As the industry evolves to more of a retail model that is consumer-centric, affordability and access will be critical to the value proposition and every market,” Swedish said. “Key to that will be an intense focus on [overhead] efficiency in direct care costs, including provider reimbursement models. Both are critical to support product design advances toward the goal of improved affordability and access for broader population.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.