IBJNews

WellPoint dismisses former interim-CEO Cannon

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

John Cannon, the man credited with righting the ship at WellPoint Inc., was terminated without cause this week, the company disclosed in a securities filing Friday morning.

The Indianapolis-based health insurer said Cannon will remain with the company until early March to help in the transition of his duties as general counsel and chief public affairs officer.

“We wish John well, and thank him for his many contributions to the organization during his tenure,” WellPoint spokeswoman Kristin Binns wrote in an email Friday. She declined to explain why Cannon was dismissed or to make Cannon available for comment.

Cannon, 60, served as WellPoint’s interim CEO from August 2012, when the company’s board ousted CEO Angela Braly under pressure from investors, until March 2013, when current CEO Joe Swedish took the helm.

Last year, Swedish dismissed Lori Beer, who was head of the specialty business unit at WellPoint. Also, after three WellPoint board members suddenly resigned shortly after Swedish became CEO, he appointed two of his friends to replace them.

During his seven-month tenure, Cannon reorganized WellPoint into four business units, completed the $4.9 billion acquisition and integration of Virginia-based Amerigroup Corp. and greatly improved what was described by WellPoint employees as a poor culture inside its corporate operation, which is headquartered on Indianapolis’ Monument Circle.

Wall Street analysts, and even Swedish, credited Cannon with getting WellPoint's earnings back on track before Swedish arrived.

Cannon was paid an annual salary of $625,000, according to WellPoint's 2013 proxy statement. His total compensation in 2012, the most recent figures available, was nearly $6.5 million, due in part to extra compensation given him for his tenure as interim CEO.

According to WellPoint’s 2013 proxy, Cannon is due to receive more than $4.9 million if he is terminated without cause.

Cannon was hired by Braly, who had also been WellPoint’s general counsel before becoming CEO, in late 2007. He came from Philadelphia-based Cigna Corp., where he worked for 19 years, ultimately becoming deputy general counsel.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Been There
    Predictable! As a turn-around expert, I also experienced the fate of Mr. Cannon. Corporate Boards expect leaders hike Mr. Cannon to do the dirty work, and right the ship. Then they fire is butt, probably because he made the current CEO look like a loser, who cannot measure up to Mr. Cannon's accomplishments.
  • Nice Parachute
    Corporate politics can sometimes be as strange as governmental politics. A $4.9 million parachute doesn't seem too bad.l
  • WellPoint has this history
    Thsi does not surprise me as I know several employees that get terminated and they will never say WHY? Lame if you ask me..

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT